We had power all along! - - - It was called “Patriarchy” a system encouraged by females to get men to work for woman’s benefit.
Meanwhile, the feminists continue to whittle away at the predominant culture by arguing that housewives are the largest unpaid workers globally, yet, worldwide the male was expected to hand over his wage packet. Man did the paid work. ‘Paid work’ is work that one would not do unless paid. Man handed wages to wife. Wife spends money. Spot the illogic. Women spent the wages. They recieced the proceeds of wages without doing the toil.
I have found numerous references from all over the world that males were expected to hand over the wage packet. Women were unpaid because they did not want to do unpleasant paid work. They got the men to do the nasty work and hand them the money. Men sometimes joke about ‘woman’s work’ in a demeaning manner. But this is a clever way to stroke male egos that males are doing something superior of which women are less capable. This is clever woman’s logic’ at work. A man looks at a task and says: “I can do that!” A woman looks at a task and says: “I can get a man to do that?” Why work down a coalmine when a stupid male will do it and hand you the wage packet. If you don’t give the man structured work, he will sit and be lazy and cause trouble. Better to keep the man occupied and productive in a structured work environment.
But the feminists came along with a male invention promoted by a complicit male-dominated media with their male-dominated financiers, and changed the definition of patriarchy to describe it as a systemic bias against women. There was a bias but it was in favour of women. The definition was adjusted to “a system of society or government controlled by men”. They missed some ingredients: Women did not want to control, so men controlled society for the benefit of women. Men have short fingernails and dress in work-suitable clothes because they were the mechanics of society and women painted their nails and went to the cafés, using money earned by a grovelling male, where they would discuss what their grovelling male slave had bought for them or how he was getting a pay rise. Or rather, she was getting a pay rise because he was getting a better position. She was getting a pay rise because he was working beyond capacity. “Oh, what a wonderful husband you have got. You are so lucky to have found him. Mine cleans drains and has to work seven days to keep my family in food.” Men worked because women had created a cartel where men only got sex if they got on their knees and pledged their undying loyalty and their total income for the rest of their lives. Now the girls are getting on their knees, but it is not to peldge undying love. The greater his wage packet, the more beautiful girl he could pledge his life’s earnings to. So good looking ‘good’ girls got well-brought-up high earning males. And less good looking girls got rough-and-tumble blokes with a few bad habits. But they all got a man and a family. Unfortunately, in a blitz of illogic, male sponsored feminism broke the cartel. Women were to be ‘liberated’ from this situation and join the workforce and sex was no longer to be used to control males. Women were to be liberated and have sex with any male. In the prevailing climate of illogic, a woman could not be considered as ‘liberated’ if she was not giving sex away for free. Girls purposely dropped their knickers to prove they were ‘liberated’. Girls have to prove they are not ‘frigid’ or ‘square’ or ‘hung-up’ by having sex with random boys when they don’t wish to. Girls have to explain why they don’t wish to be screwed by a male. One girl’s comments:
“The Sexual Revolution tells me that I am abnormal if I don’t desire to make it with every Tom, Dick, of Jane that I see. I am only free to say ‘Yes’.” [1]
Here is another comment:
“Now you have to prove how liberated you are and men use that.” [1]
And another:
“All of them had come under intense pressure to have sex: the boys to show they were not ‘batty’, the girls to prove they were not ‘frigid’. Most had caved in — simply because... they could not think of a single reason to say no.” [2]
And one more:
“Most men didn’t give a damn about whether I wanted to have sex with them or not; If I didn’t want to screw them, they would make a moral thing out of it, and try to lecture me into being ‘free’.” [1]
In the flood of illogic, the complaint was made that males were the evil oppressors. If male behaviour was so bad, one would assume then that male behaviour should be brought up to the level of female behaviour but illogic reigned and women were told they needed to behave like the evil males. They were to be equally promiscuous. But what is strange, before my time, men could not be promiscuous because no girl would have sex with them. Men could not get sex in the average village because no girl would give it to them. Males cannot be promiscuous if girls are not promiscuous. Males had to bend to women’s demand for marriage.
Ten-thousand-years of the development of civilization was destroyed in one bout of popularized illogic. Sexual liberation was no gain for women. Women now have a near-impossible task of finding a male to marry them. Only the best looking women have the ability to tie a man into sexual servitude. Sex had been the controlling method over males. The female cartel was very clever. If I wanted sex with a girl, the girl would say: “If you want sex with me, you must marry me and when we get married, I decide when sex occurs. And what is more, for the rest of your life, you must hand your wage packet to me at the end of each week.” The ‘cartel’ was a key component of civilisation. This cartel enabled the harnessing of male sexual energy for the benefit of civilisation, which in effect means women and offspring. Caprizchka words it this way:
“The simple reason for this is that in order to power the survival of any community, young men need to be motivated to exercise their productivity for benefit of that community with the overriding motivation for that exercise ... being the hope that they too might start their own little dynasty which of course starts with a woman willing to merge her reproductivity with his productivity.
Under Feminism, the overriding motivation of all productivity is to avoid penalty of law because the women are not only unbearably obnoxious but have all sexual rights enforced by the state. This is the stick approach, rather than the carrot.”
Unfortunately, illogic gets trapped in the equation:
“One bad man = all men are bad and therefore all men (and women) must have their sexuality policed by the state.”
Caprizchka continues the rant with :
“Thanks to Feminism, a woman is unable to make a contract with a man bartering her ‘excess reproductivity’ and sexual market value for his ‘excess productivity’ (Karen Straughan’s terms) and call it ‘marriage’.
Only Female sexual dominance in a relationship is considered ‘Politically Correct’ by the ‘tolerant’ set.”
Unfortunately, women lost their sexual dominance outside of marriage creating a ‘free for all’ for enterprising males who now shun marriage for fear of consequences.
Without the taming of males, such that they are brought under the servitude of women, no civilisation is possible. The paperwork said the male had the power, but the reality was the woman had the power. This is ‘The Secret’. Male’s natural state is to be lazy and troublesome, that is why it is essential to keep them occupied in the service of women. The simplistic logic used by males did not allow them to see how they had been manipulated. Woman’s control of the crèche and nursery enabled the training of males. Girls were brought up with an element of narcissism so that they treated it as normal that they should receive all the product of male endeavour.
Procedures were put in place to control male sexual enthusiasm. Through history, sex had been demonized to be treated as a ‘naughty’ taboo subject so that women could say to their man-slave: “All you think about is the ‘s’ word.” The clever female would never even mention the word and everything about his desire was because he was ‘naughty’. If she orgasmed, it was his fault for ‘leading her astray’.
Although sexual liberation was no gain for women, it was a massive gain for males. Any enterprising young male can sleep with as many girls as he wishes. I know a male that has bedded five-hundred women. I met a male on a train on its way to California who confided that he had slept with fifteen-hundred women. “Even on a train, with a girl he had met on the train!” I met a Canadian that reckoned he had bedded above five thousand. He just backpacked around the world banging girls in hostels as he went. The enterprising male can organize Mary for Monday, Wendy for Wednesday, Freda for Friday and that still leaves Saturday for partying and chasing girls. Never before has sex been so available to enterprising males. Males have become so skilled at the procedure that they have learned to use the same tactics that females were using to emotionally control males. The female cartel on sex, where they cooperatively agreed to the principle of ‘no sex before marriage’, was destroyed by those that promoted the feminist viewpoint.
In any nation, one can always find a considerable range of viewpoints. The media only needs to promote a particular narrow range of viewpoints, with a bit of poor opposition to make it look genuine, and they can make the illogical popular. Popularised music was telling the young that: “sex is natural, sex is fun” [George Michael]. Britain lost its empire and women lost their cartel. I regularly say to girls: “The easiest thing for you to do in life is to pass exams and get jobs. They even tipped the table in your direction. The hardest thing for you to do in life will be to find a man that is prepared to marry you.” They thank me profusely for awakening them to this knowledge.
The male has the potential to be a violent lustful beast. It is easy to fill jails with male rapists. Unfortunately, they have to commit a rape before they are incarcerated. The only way to make the world safe for women is to train the young males when they are very small. Mothers carry out this training. As Tanika said to me one night: “Dogs, men, and children. It’s all the same thing.” She was referring to the methods used to train dogs which are similar to the way mothers train children and similar to the way girls train their male partners. When an adult female goes to hit a man, his hands stay by his side and he weathers the hit. He does not even raise his arms in defence. He takes the thumps. I have seen this with security officers. Girls lay into them with fists and the male just takes the thumps. The mother’s training is so effective that the male is impotent in front of a female. Even male interviewers do not throw the verbal punches at females that the female interviewers throw at males. The only way that we can make the world safe for females is to train males at a very young age to treat females, the way females want to be treated. If this next generation of females does not follow this female-domination of males at youth, the world will become a very dangerous place for females. Well, it is already. It is crucial that young males are trained in the etiquette of deferring to women. It also means that women act in a manner that they can be defered to!
Marriage also has a role in keeping males in check. The male does not behave graciously until he has a girlfriend. Marriage mollifies the activities of males so that they do not cause havoc. They are all working for the betterment of females and society.
I sometimes joke: “Let’s create a patriarchy. That is the males in charge. Well. Women can be sent out to work. When they have finished at work they can come home and take care of the house. And in the bedroom, they can satisfy the man's every whim. ... Mmmmm! That sounds like what we have at present.” I continue: “Let’s create a matriarchy. Let us send the men off to work and when he has walked out the door, we shall whizz off in the pram to the park to feed the ducks with the children. Then to the beach. Off to the cafés for lunch and then visit friends. Pop home in the afternoon to quickly knock up a bit of dinner. ... Oh! That sounds like what occurred when I was young when I went out with my mother whilst father worked in the factory.” What was described as patriarchy was matriarchy in disguise. Men worked for the benefit of women. Men looked after women better than women look after women. Women did not need nor want the vote because men looked after them better than any women ever looked after them. A small group of women smashed windows and demanded the vote. Governing males freely gave them the vote even though not all males had the vote at the time. Don’t forget the irony that Christabel Pankhurst and her supporters handed out white feathers to indicate cowardice to any young males in the street who were wearing civilian clothes. They had demanded the vote but not subscription to the death of war. They were happy to shame males that did not go to war. They did not hand white feathers to women, only men. Times moved on and more women came along and demanded that women work. More women came along and demanded that women have sex with whoever they wish whenever they wished. They even had the audacity to call it ‘liberation’. “You have been liberated from freedom!” You go to work instead of cafés. You have childcare instead of going to the beach with your children. Illogic was taking hold. Give me the beach with the children any day.
Bonecracker: “Once married and attached to their own children, these beta males were suddenly yoked like an ox and working at 100 capacity. This utilization of the full capacity of male labour is what pulled mankind into a civilization. It is what built our houses and planted our corn. It built our roads and our bridges. It created our literature and our art. It created, well, pretty much everything that we have. Men, women, and children all obviously benefited from this. Welcome to the Patriarchy! (Sometimes it is simply known as civilization, but also, occasionally, as fatherhood).” [4]
Some girls know ‘The Secret’. Some girls don’t. This is a women-only secret. It is not for men to know. If you are a man, put the book down or give it to a girl. If you are a girl, you should not let a male read this book. Some girls are simply not taught — ‘The Secret’. I was explaining the content of the book and a girl looked at me wide-eyed and said: “You know — ‘The Secret’!” She called her friend over and said: “He knows — ‘The Secret’!” Other girls look at me puzzled and say: “I have never heard of this.” I have to quietly explain it to them and, at the end, they look at me with amazement and say something to the effect: “That’s amazing! How come I never heard it before?” I smile and give them a respectful nod. I think: “Another girl going to get those men into line and working for society.” I’m on the side of girls. Strange as it may seem, as men, we are very happy dedicating our lives to a girl and family — even if they go a bit strange as the years go by! A German girl in Cologne Airport on my flight that had been delayed for thirty-six hours, said, with a knowing gleam in her eye: “This is what my mother taught me!” She knew ‘The Secret’ — but most don’t. Many girls are misguided girls that believe the crap from ‘Satan’s Pulpit’.
‘The Secret’ puts power in the hands of women. It is the way that women handled males through the centuries from the time of Jesus. It developed after Jesus put a brake on the inappropriate behaviour of males. He demanded monogamy for life whilst teaching peace and love. The kind and gentle nature of Jesus was to become the role model for males throughout Christendom. This protected women. However, even if you wish to denigrate religion, encouraging males to emulate Jesus was a big benefit to females. His stand on marriage played straight into the hands of women giving women great influence over the life of males. Even if you claim to be an Atheist or an Agnostic, if you are living in a European based country, the predominant culture is 'Philosophy of Jesus' which embodies Christian Patriarchy. You can only be Atheist or Agnostic because of the tolerance of Christianity. The current Western brand of Church Christianity is not Hebraic rooted but has Greco-Roman origins, and the current Judaism is missing a Savior. I say that the real Christianity is that which is taught by mothers to their sons. Mothers use Jesus as a role model to turn the young males into benevolent leaders of families where the male sacrifices all for ‘his’ family. In pastor type speech — Christian Patriarchy is not man dominance. The male must love and care for his family as Christ loves the people and, if necessary, he must lay down his life for it. His life’s effort must be devoted to the support of his family. He loves his wife and family even more than his own life. Without involving the male at this level of responsibility, the male will have no responsibility and we will return to the ‘rule of the jungle’ where women had no ‘power of no’. Where men and women set themselves against one another in an environment that has no joy for women. Israel Lim words it this way on his Biblical Patriarchy website:
“The underlying culture and true foundation of the true gospel had long been renounced, removed and replaced with Hellenism and Romanism that gave birth to the Roman worldview of the modern culture. The present Christian Gospel is influenced by the Western European culture, and not by the Middle-Eastern culture wherein the gospel was ordained to be originated and interpreted. The truth is now twisted and denuded, yet the Church is totally oblivious of it. It must be restored!”
He is saying that Christianity has been taken off the rails by the organised church. Jesus told us to be good to each other which many word as: “Do the right thing” but he also stood up against authority when authority was wrong. We were also warned against following false prophets which we might as well call “Satan’s Pulpit” which approximates to the mainstream media. It also includes anyone who implores us to do the ‘wrong thing’.
Jesus also talked with abandoned and discarded women. He told the males that if they remarried inappropriately, they were committing adultery which meant that they would not go to heaven. His strong stand played into the hands of women who could then create stable families where the man could not discard them and run off with younger women. The loving and caring family developed from this under 'Christian Patriarchy' enforced on males by mothers. Train those males whilst they are young!
Jesus was aligned with the Essenes. It appears that the Essenes had gathered the best documents from other religions with the aim of creating the best religion. Thus the Essenes were progressive. Without moving from the words of Jesus, it is possible, under his example to bring true Christianity up to date with words appropriate to modern times. The secular state makes laws that are always negative and tend to suit those with influence which tend to be those with access to money. Well off citizens ignore the law, flout the law, or adjust the law to suit their own ends. Religion is necessary to give a positive aspect as in: “Do the right thing.” Pornography gained prominence under the argument of ‘free speech’ whilst having a devastating effect on our culture. Land is apportioned according to who has the better access to money or loans regardless of need. Yet land was created by god or nature for all living things to share. We should all have our share. Taxation is biased by clever wording of tax laws in favour of the well off. Democracy is destroyed by monied lobbyists. All major political parties support the debt-banking system imposed after World War Two. Major political parties support every war advertized on ‘Satan’s Pulpit’ — the mainstream media.
Israel Lim continues:
“Why God allowed the Church to sink so deep into the heathen mire, nobody can give a satisfactory answer, considering the mass blindness and terrible devastation of the spiritual dark ages that followed.”
It is very necessary to put the onus on the male because we descend from a range of violent animals. Of the genders, the male is the more violent. He must be encouraged during upbringing to channel his energies for the benefit of women and children. The training in ‘Christian Patriarchy’ is done in the crèche, over which mothers have control. ‘The Secret’ — females train males to look after females.
Before Jesus, there existed a situation called: “Any Fault Divorce”. A man would marry a girl and might later divorce her. The ‘Any fault’ could be that “She is not as pretty as when I married her.” In biblical times, there were many destitute women. There was no welfare. Jesus applied the previous laws more strictly. He said: “When you marry, it is for life.” He demanded monogamy for life. He also said: “If you divorce without appropriate reason and remarry, you are committing adultery.” Adultery was not looked upon lightly by society. He really nailed it when he said: “If you even think about it, you are committing adultery.” That was very clever. If you even ‘think about it’ — you are guilty of adultery. Clever man, this Jesus fellow. This effectively made large numbers of males into sinners. Sexual thoughts were classed as sinful and this gave women their chance to control males. We still think of sex as ‘naughty’ which allows women to control the lust of males. This stand in favour of women made him very unpopular with the better-off males in a society that could afford to throw their wives out when they found a younger wife.
He was also teaching love and peace. Under the rules of Jesus, the married couple had to have a harmonious relationship. Many males were against Jesus for his strict interpretation of rules on marriage. Affluent males who could afford to ‘update the wife’ were particularly critical of Jesus. The teaching of Jesus forced a loving cooperation on a couple. They had to ‘get on’ to survive a life together. This gave strength to the family unit and brought men’s behaviour into line. The family unit had always been the building block of civilization. The family unit has always been important to ensure the quality upbringing of the young to create a harmonious society. In effect, the family unit enabled the energy of the male to be harnessed for the good of society and for the benefit of females. Instead of men grabbing what they wanted with violence, males were required to put their energies to work for the benefit of society and their families. Sex with violence was effectively quashed by civilization and sex for work and subservience to society became the norm. Essentially, at the start of civilization, females learned to control the impulses of males. The male has the potential to be a violent lusting beast. The only way that we can make society safe for females is by training young males to respect women. This can only be accomplished when the boys are very young.
The mothers trained the boys to respect women. The women controlled from a position of weakness. Just as a frail old man can control a nation of millions, and a ten-year-old girl can control a horse, and a pilot can control a 747 Jumbo, a girl can control the world wrestling champion. She would never use force, other than a light tug on the arm to drag him along. She would use facial expressions and emotional connection. He might be the strongest man in the world, but he is weak in the hands of a skilled female. No male would challenge him but a girl can challenge him and win. This requires one proviso: his mother taught him well. What did the mother teach, you might ask? She taught him respect for girls. The weight lifting champion is the little boy in the picture above. Our girl could get annoyed at our wrestling champion and walk right up and slap him on the face and his hands would not move in self-defence. Why? Because his mother taught him well. In the words of Peter sitting next to me from Gatwick to Miami: “She gave me that look.” Our wrestler would get the ‘look’ — and behave himself.
So male violence was effectively quashed and lifetime work and subservience to society became the norm when humans invented civilization. Under Jesus, this became refined. The male became tied to one woman for life which is not a male’s natural way. Christianity spread due to the demand from within the family. Christianity gave stability to the family from the woman’s point of view. In other words, the women of the family demanded Christianity and Christian Patriarchy because it gave them stability and ended some of the worst practices of men. Jesus was the greatest champion of women’s rights in history. Jesus gave women a great position of strength within society. From within the family, the women could train the very young males how they were to act in society. By teaching the young males to comply with the demands of Christianity Patriarchy, male behaviour could be controlled. This is the greatness of Christianity. The church and its rituals are the ‘sideshow’. The real Christianity is the Christian Patriarchy as taught by mothers to ensure male compliance with female demands.
Boys were controlled by mothers and this same respect was later transferred to the wife. This is at the very core of Christianity. The women teach the very young boys how to behave and act in society. To me, the real Christianity is the value set taught by mothers to their young. The smooth operation of society completely depends upon the value set taught to the young by mothers. If we break this ‘mother’s influence’, society could yet again become violent for women. Society becomes very violent for women whenever there is a breakdown in society. Witness any war. Men go off to die in battle, but when one side conquers, the women suffer. On the winning side, the women lose their men. On the losing side, the women lose their innocence, virginity, and decorum as they are ravished by the conquering army. They no longer have their males to protect them. The protection offered by Christian Patriarchy is suspended and women suffer terribly until Patriarchy is reinstated.
Let us use pure logic. Man has the potential to be a dangerous and deadly animal. Before civilization, man was a violent hunter. This characteristic is biology which cannot be changed. For the most of the animal kingdom, it involves a gentle courting process, but humans have an extra neocortex brain which allows diversions from instinctual practice. Violence is always a possibility. But the behaviour can be modified. The best time to teach males is when they are very young. Very very young. When I talk to the big tough security males outside nightclubs, I say:
“Did your mother teach you to: ‘Never hit a girl.’?”
They answer:
“Yes.”
I say:
“How did she re-enforce that?”
They reply by indicating a slap with the hand.
I say:
“Did your mother say: ‘Don’t answer your mother back.’?”
They answer:
“Yes.”
I say:
“How did she re-enforce that?”
They reply by indicating a slap with the hand. Thus the young boys are trained at a very young age to respect women. It is the mothers that teach males to respect females.
The biology of males is modified and overridden by the actions of mothers. The only way we can make society safe for women is to train young males to respect women from a very young age. If we break this arrangement, we risk making society dangerous for women. Just watch a young mother in the street to see the training in action.
So Christianity was chosen from within the family because it gave women power in society. This was not power as in authoritarian ‘direct rule’, this was power in that males were manipulated to work and act for the benefit of females. Males went out to work and brought home the goods to women. Until recent times, men would work and bring home the wage packet and give it to the woman. There was a double play going on. Men thought they were in charge whilst in reality, everything they did was for the benefit of a woman and her offspring. When given the opportunity to make decisions, the male made decisions for the benefit of wife and children.
The woman controls by emotional influence. Without the use of emotional influence, the woman puts herself in a position where she may be beaten by the man and sometimes in both meanings of the word. This also explains why young males are taught to hide their emotions. This is usually expressed as: “Boys don’t cry.” A Chinese man on the screen just said in Chinese to his young son: “Were big men now. We don’t need to cry.” Boys are taught to repress their emotion so that they are not visible. Do not mistake this for a man not hurting. The man may be torn apart inside but he will hide it as per his training. Don’t doubt it. I am sixty-six. If I walk into a venue, even as a computer consultant, and persons that I expect to give me a welcome, fail to do so, I am gutted. I hide it, but the torment is still there, but totally hidden. I think: “What have I done wrong?” Sometimes it is an error and they makeup later. Male’s lack of visible emotion gives girls a better handle to manipulate as he will operate with a straight face whilst she will control his emotions. (Until he explodes. Do not push a man until he explodes. It is not nice.) A girl did it to me the other day. She ignored me. Later, she said: “You were early today.” She knew exactly what time I had arrived so she had registered my arrival but pretended she had not seen me.
When a couple argues, they straight-face each other or refuse eye contact. Emotional connection disappears and resentment builds. She is trying to use female logic against man’s logic. Men are very good with logic. She may lose. She may get him to ‘shut up’ but she will also ‘shut him down’. Not a clever manoeuvre for a woman who has emotional manipulation skills. He will forever doubt his master.
The ability to argue arrived with language one-hundred-thousand-years-ago. Arguments were not possible one-hundred-thousand-years-ago. You should not need to argue as you have superior skills and without you realizing it, it is quite possible that his logic outclasses your logic and his method of approaching logic will be different from yours. You will outclass him on emotion every time, but you won’t outclass him on logic every time and you will put yourself close to a slave rebellion. He will rebel against his master.
In choosing a male, a girl only needs one item on her list — he must love his mother. If he loves his mother and you have the skills to maintain the relationship, he will be a good husband. There is a second set of skills required to maintain a relationship. These are in this book. But back to logic. The use of logic will cause problems. A man is likely to equal or outclass you at logic. It is his strong point. His weak point is emotion. If you argue with a man, and he ‘shuts up’, it does not mean that you have won the argument. It means that you went past the point where males reconcile and agree to an outcome. All you have created is hate and resentment.
If you are male, please close this book and give it to a girl. I have written a website for males. This is written for girls and not for your male eyes. If you are a girl, do not give it to any man. It has secrets that are not for men.
“The first rule of Fight Club: You do not talk about Fight Club.”
— [Tyler Durden, from the movie “Fight Club]
And for the girls, this is going to be difficult to turn around. The vagina is the instinctual goal for the male. It is in his DNA. It is an ancient instinct. It is his entire driving force and is programmed into his reptile brain. Sex has enormous exchange value. In the past, males had to marry a girl, accept her terms on when sex would occur (the power of ‘no’), and promise to support her for life, and hand his entire wage packet over to her weekly. Now girls sleep with men on the supposed fear that he will go to another that will. The promiscuity has become self-perpetuating by a hoard of males that have learned to manipulate the situation and use the wording of Feminism and the accompanying ‘sexual revolution’ to their advantage. Associate Professor Mark Regnerus has these words of wisdom:
“If women remember that sex has considerable ‘exchange value,’ they are more apt to get what they want: security, responsibility, attention, affection, exclusivity, and commitment. That is power. It won’t be easy, since the numbers aren’t in their favor. But to give up and hookup will guarantee only sex. And that isn’t much of an accomplishment.” [3]
He says: “Sex isn’t much of an accomplishment.” Men desire sex, so a girl can get bed any day of the week. Some girls get $100 per bang so giving it away for free is no accomplishment. A clever girl will get a lifetime of support which might amount to one million dollars. But it is not a money thing, sex with no babies is a bit of a joke. When I travel thought Muslim countries, I am constantly asked by males if I have children. In the West, I rarely get asked. The dick is designed to make babies. This is clearly clear in Muslim countries. In the West, dominated by pornography, the dick has become a novelty that is put in women’s mouths or anywhere else inappropriate. Porn has given terrible training that the penis and testes are not related to babies. A woman is something you sexually abuse rather than sexually arouse.
Earlier, Mark Regnerus states:
“...the hookup norm is not so easily altered. Most women don’t know how to work around it, or they fear that in doing so, men will ignore them.” [3]
Historically, abstinence was more than a method of birth-control — it was part of ‘The Secret’ — the method of controlling male sexuality by the restriction of sex. That is why the 'Christian West' allowed women to ‘show’ their wares in the form of cleavage to accent the desirability of females to keep males chasing females who would then limit access. Around the time of eighteen, mothers might actively encourage their daughters to dress provocatively with the aim of attracting the young males. At the same time, there was a strict ‘closed leg’ policy and the women created a ‘no means no’ policy which we can assume did not exist in jungle life. The sexual revolution changed this to ‘no’ means ‘sexually repressed’ and ‘yes’ means ‘slut’.