Using women to destabilise a nation is a clever tactic. Males will fight males but they give in when confronted by a pitchfork-wielding woman.
Men are naturally disposed to seek cooperation with women for breeding and this is magnified by their upbringing in the hands of their mothers as per ‘The Secret’. A woman with a broomstick has more power than a male with a gun.
Even the French Revolution utilised the women of France to destabilize the existing regime.
The usurers had placed their agent Jacques Necker as the treasurer to King Louis. Necker was previously a Swiss banker loyal to the usurers. He proceeded to get the French king into debt for gold, the interest on which could not be paid. It was the same usurers trick that has devastated people and nations for the past five thousand years. How can anyone pay back more gold than exists? If you and I own all the gold in the world and we lend it out at ten percent, the borrowers cannot pay it back because there is no extra gold. So you and I start to own all their assets. This is elementary usury banned by most of the prophets, Islam, and the Christian church. The Jewish people rely on the old testament statement by Moses: “Thou shalt not lend money and expect more in return from thine neighbour”, which meant another Jewish person, “but you may lend money and expect more in return from a foreigner.” This is blatant apartheid and thus those wishing to practice usury, claim to be Jewish, even if they do not have a line of descent from Isaac’s son, Jacob.
Since the beginning of civilisation, there have been battles over who should create the money of the nation. All our wars in living memory have been over the right to create money and the violence required to maintain that authority. In recent centuries, gullible Christian nations have provided the cannon fodder to maintain monetary authority. The fake news propaganda machine tells the gullible people a fanciful story about the persons in another country being bad people, which then makes them worthy of the bullet. Under the Church, the monarch created the money for a nation in a debt-free manner. But the usurers prefer to create money and lend it into society and get the people into debt, whence they can reap enormous wealth and maintain control by financial influence.
Deuteronomy, which records the speeches of Moses, also says: “You shall rule over many peoples, but no peoples shall rule over thee.” The usurers use this as a justification for their actions. Where these usurers lend and spend is where the nation is directed. Corporations dance to their tune as do major political parties.
The usurers prefer a democracy where they can financially influence both main parties. Thus, both main political parties support the ‘debt banking system’ and every war advertised by the international news agencies. You can vote for party ‘A’ that supports the debt banking system and war or you can vote for party ‘B’ that also supports the debt banking system and war. War arrives by propaganda to flatten any nation not singing to the tune of the usurers. Capitalism is old testament usury. Anybody objecting is called anti-Semitic. Semitic means from the Semitic tribes which are from the middle east, but these usurers do not originate from the middle-east, but that does not stop them from silencing the objectors with the slur ‘anti-Semitism’. The term anti-Christian does not get used in the same manner, nor does the term ‘Christophobic’. Killing sixty-six-million Christians simply does not get into the history books because the death of Christians is not newsworthy.
Division and strife are tools that prevent opposition to the usurer’s machinations. Feminism played its role in strife creation and pushed women into the corporate workforce. It created a competitive rift between females and males that was of no benefit to females nor males. It took Western white women from the pinnacle of respectability to a position where they are seen worldwide as porn actresses at the service of males. In 2001, Henry Makow Ph.D. wrote:
“Feminism masquerades as a movement for women’s rights. This kind of deception is typical of subversive movements of Communist origin. In reality, feminism is ruthlessly opposed to femininity, masculinity, heterosexuality, the nuclear family, and children. It deliberately promotes homosexuality which, according to experts, is a form of arrested development. Feminism neuters women, rendering them less fit to become wives and mothers. Men are emasculated, unable to create families, or make sacrifices for the sake for their children. If feminism were genuine, it would have disappeared when discrimination against women ended. It continues as a tool of the elite agenda: depopulation, de-stabilizing society, and dismantling Western Civilization. ... Feminism has taken over the education and legal systems, the media and federal bureaucracy because dismantling our culture is the elite agenda.”
The American dream has become a nightmare.
Who has ultimate power has always been an issue since humans created civilisation. Civilisation required the taming of the males under female influence. Male lust was harnessed to the benefit of women. This was the whole basis of civilisation. By tying one man to one woman, he worked for wife and family and was restricted from causing havoc. Feminism has enabled males to avoid marriage and work. It has allowed males with ‘game’ to manipulate women as sexual playthings whilst other males with less forwardness are looked over by females. Being lazy and causing havoc is the natural state for males. However, a civilisation needs civic order, rules, and a money system. Money systems need civic order and an element of compulsion. Rules were created by persons who came to be known as religious people and the local warlord became benevolent as a king. New warlords try to take over, and the latest warlords are the moneyed elite. They have systematically destroyed the last group of monarchs and its support system — the established church system in Europe. We now live on borrowed money rather than the debt-free money of sovereigns. This means that we have to work very hard to pay interest on money that was created out of thin air by the usurers.
I claim the real Christianity is the value system passed from mother to son which is a component of what you now know as ‘The Secret’. In the destruction of the support system for the monarchs, the Christian value system became collateral damage. Nation-states tend to operate on laws, but these laws are always negative as in: “Don’t do this” and “Don’t do that.” Whereas, religions tell people to be good to others. The version of Christianity as taught by Christ told people to “be good to each other”. That goodness is not reciprocated by other religions. It is noticeable at Christmas. People say: “Merry Christmas!” They don’t say: “Are you Christian?” If so: “Merry Christmas”, else: “Go to hell.” Other religions don’t match this. They wish well for persons of their religion. They tend to think people of other religions are of lesser importance and can be mistreated. This is wonderful except that the decency to others leaves Christianity vulnerable to outside forces. That is why Crusader forces were set up to combat external influences.
This goodness lives on in the saying: “Do the right thing”. If you were born and brought up in a Christian nation, you were given this value system even if you reject the institutionalised Church as set up by the Roman Emperor Constantine. The Church gets dragged off the rails by human forces at times but the real Christianity is what mothers pass to their children particularly when they use Jesus as a role model. This is the real Christian culture — even if you dislike the current crop of priests. If you wish good on others, you have the Christian value system imbedded in you. If you are full of hate, you are not of the Christian religion. This is why strife occurs between different religions. Gadhafi said that it is better to have only one religion in a nation. This was quite wise. Israel is known as the Jewish state. Middle Eastern nations are Islamic, and European nations are commonly referred to as Christian nations. Putting a million Christians into a Muslim nation is going to cause strife. Putting a million Jewish people into Palestine is causing terrible problems, putting a few million Middle Eastern people into Europe is not going to work. I travel widely and get on with all people (as a visitor) but that does not translate to mixing people in a land where they work from different cultural rulebooks. One will eventually take advantage of the other and overrule the other. It is even worse when their texts tell them to do so. Islam says to kill or enslave others. And the Jewish old testament says many things including: “Thou shalt rule over many peoples.”
Under Christianity, as taught by mothers, there is no book of rules for ‘do the right thing’. We instinctively know what ‘do the right thing’ means. The rules of the nation-state are all negative and people think they are ok if they are not breaking the law or don’t get caught breaking the law. The wealthy will engineer the law to suit their machinations, even if it harms others or causes wars. Killing becomes ok if it is legally sanctioned. Thus, the operation of a state without a religion becomes problematic as the state has no way to get people to ‘do the right thing’. The state only has ways of stopping people from doing the wrong thing &mdashl and it does not do that very well.
The skill set of the moneyed elite had increased with the beheading of King Charles I of England in 1649 after the chaos they had created in the English Revolution.
The moneymen brought in a patsy from Amsterdam called William of Orange who was happy to comply with their every wish.
The tactics used by the usurers were improved and utilised to destabilise the monarchy in France by orchestrating the French Revolution. This took significant effort and planning and was orchestrated from the City of London. Jacques Necker, an agent of the bankers became the treasurer for King Louis.
This Swiss banker persuaded King Louis to borrow gold from the moneylenders. When the king could not repay, Jacques Necker persuaded the king to raise the taxes that then enabled the usurers to turn the people against the king. The invention of the printing press enabled pamphleteering to spread lies about the king. Secret societies were engaged to turn the peasantry against the king. No pitchfork wielding mob was going to overthrow a monarchy. This was a highly orchestrated overthrow of a monarchy. Five to ten thousand women marched to Versailles to demand justice, but the king was the wrong enemy. The marching women were mostly market women unable to feed their families due to the price and scarcity of bread. The mob of women magnified to some sixty thousand within a couple of days. This woman’s march turned the tide against royal rule in France. King Louis was forced to submit to the will of the women. A bloodbath followed. Unfortunately, the women got the wrong enemy and became part of the bloodbath.
Many were killed. even the heavily edited Wikipedia claims:
“Most of these outwardly activist women were punished for their militancy. The kind of punishment received during the Revolution included public denouncement, arrest, execution, or exile. Théroigne de Méricourt was arrested, publicly flogged and then spent the rest of her life sentenced to an insane asylum. Pauline Léon and Claire Lacombe were arrested, later released, and continued to receive ridicule and abuse for their activism. Many of the women of the Revolution were even publicly executed for ‘conspiring against the unity and the indivisibility of the Republic’.” [12]
As is usual in a revolution, the revolution turns on its own ‘useful idiots’ to get them out of the way for the real power hungry perpetrators who tricked the useful idiots into helping them overthrow a government. The real enemy was the usurers who had pushed King Louis into debt and damaged his ability to run the nation. The revolution was not the work of Frenchmen to improve France. It was the work of foreigners, whose object was to destroy everything, which had been France. [1] The usurers, to you, are the money-men, the moneyed elite, and the bankers. The modern control system is the spider’s web of corporations whose shares are mostly owned by the moneyed elite who also control their activities. Politics is now heavily influenced by corporations who act through lobbyists who act as the bribery agents of the corporations.
The fake news machine creates a dog-fight between the two main parties, but both are controlled by the usurers. As in ‘The Wonderful Wizard of Oz’, look out for the men pulling the strings from behind the curtain. You are allowed to have the views of the ‘right’ because it is approved by those in charge. You are allowed to have the views of the ‘left’ because it is approved by those in charge. The right supports the debt banking system and capitalism. The left is favoured by the elite as is aligns with communism. Other viewpoints are labelled ‘alt’ right or ‘extreme’ or ‘far’ right and derided. It is all a bit strange because right an left referred to thinking in a French parliament many years ago. Currently, both right and left support the ideology of Feminism even though it is clearly on the left side of politics being a form of Communism lite. The oppressor was switched from the aristocracy to males in general, particularly white males.
As is usual in a revolution, the French Revolution turned on the gullible idiots used to foment the revolution.
This is what will happen to the gullible idiots that fell for the Feminist revolution. Millions of Christians will be killed before they have time to cry. Many of the women involved in the French Revolution were publicly executed for ‘conspiring against the unity and the indivisibility of the Republic’.
The guillotine was a clever invention that made the removal of heads very speedy and efficient. After 1791, there was a rise in militant feminist activism. From 1793, women were banned from forming their political clubs. By May of 1795, women were banned from ‘attending political assemblies’. Their usefulness was over. In the current era, the white women of feminism are being sacrificed. Women are used as ‘useful idiots’ in revolutions. They were used for this purpose in the Russian revolution. China used this tactic. They are trying to get the American people to reject the democratically elected President Trump.
As is usually the case with these contrived revolutions, they end up establishing regimes that are far more ruthless than the ones they replaced. They turn on the ‘useful idiots’ in what ever way suits. In the ‘Sexual Revolution’ — women were convinced to give sex away for free in a big ‘fuck fest’ for males. Girls simply cannot find males prepared to marry them. The propaganda called porn degraded them to sexual servants of males in fantasyland but rendered them impotent in reality.
Oh, and by the way, the French revolution was an upgraded version of the English Revolution. In the English Revolution, political turmoil was created amongst the people that led to civil war and King Charles I having his head removed by his enemies in a show trial.
Charles the first was tried, convicted, and executed for high treason in 1649. A republic called the Commonwealth of England was declared which degenerated into an oppressive military dictatorship under Oliver Cromwell which also allowed the moneylenders a free hand as they had financed Cromwell. Cromwell died in 1658. The monarchy was restored in 1660 as Charles I’s son was crowned as Charles II, but with vastly reduced powers. The Church still banned the lending of money with interest which is called usury. The Church knew of the impoverishment caused by debt, the unpayable nature of debt, and the immense power obtained by the usurers. Here is the money and debt graphs for the USA from one of my economics books:
The usurers lost power for a while. King Charles II died in 1685. His replacement, King James, was not popular with the protestants because he was Catholic. Dividing the Christian church played into the hands of the usurers. It enabled the usurers to play different sects of Christians against each other. Even the World Wars were caused by the usurers playing different Christian groups against each other. His unpopularity allowed the usurers to bring in William of Orange from Holland as the next king on the proviso that he signed on the dotted line. This new king of England was tricked into borrowing the money of the nation rather than creating it debt free. England has been in debt ever since
and the usurers patsy army allowed usury to conquer the world in the form of the British Empire controlled by the City of London financiers — the usurers. Further revolution and war cleared out the remaining kings of Europe and eroded the Christian opposition to the usurers and their power games. The First World War was started for whimsical reasons and succeed in clearing out numerous monarchies and preparing Russia for communist overthrow. The First World War caused the greatest incidence of abolition of monarchies in history.
The importation of William of Orange from Holland led to the creation of the Bank of England in 1694 owned by private interests. Until that time, the monarch had created the money of the nation which created debt-free money for the nation. The English Revolution created the situation where the usurers could get England into debt to them for monies that were impossible to repay. No national debt exists when a monarch creates the money of the nation. The Second World War destroyed a nation that resisted Bolshevism and had created its own money system independent of the international usurers. Germany went from an impoverished nation to the most powerful in less than five years by creating money independent of the usurers. It also ended all the vice and pornography and made the family the strong unit of the nation. For getting up the noses of the usurers it got punished by the usurers patsy armies. Germany got the reward of being flattened and it still gets blamed for things it did not do.
Karl Marx got many of his ideas from the French Revolution. The Bolshevik’s party was modelled on the Jacobin Party’s clubs and networks across France. The Jacobins used tactical violence that came to be known as the ‘Reign of Terror.’ Lenin updated the tactics and used firing squads.
The Bolsheviks even shot the youngest daughter of Tsar Nicholas II along with the rest of the royal family.
Kate Wiegand’s ‘Red Feminism: Communism and the Making of Women’s Liberation’ (2002) gives us an interesting insight into the machinations behind feminism. Kate Wiegand informs us that, despite the anti-Communism atmosphere in the West, Communist Feminists managed to introduce many of its elements under the guise of feminism and women’s liberation. Key Communist activists learned to use gender, sexism, and race to create a popular culture for political purposes which altered the American society. Kate Weigand states:
“ideas, activists and traditions that emanated from the Communist movement of the forties and fifties continued to shape the direction of the new women’s movement of the 1960s and later.”
What has become clear is that human nature is malleable and can be shaped by indoctrination and propaganda. By creating a popular culture that is destructive, society can be controlled. Henry Makow claims they they refuse to debate, don’t believe in free speech, and suppress dissenting views. He suggests that they behave like a quasi-religious cult, or like the Red Guard. Henry Makow gets serious by claiming that “feminism is Communism by another name”.
Russian revolutionary, Inessa Armand, the first leader of the Women’s Department of the 1917 Russian revolution long ago stated:
“If women’s liberation is unthinkable without communism, then communism is unthinkable without women’s liberation.”
But the real truth is revealed in this: ‘Short End of the Stick’ ‘Parade’ 1990:
“Approximately forty million Soviet men were killed in wars and purges between 1914 & 1945. Soviet women took over almost every kind of manual labor in the country. Russian women constitute 98% street-cleaners, 66% highway workers and 90% of the conveyor belt operators. 92% of Soviet women work outside their homes and according to those immigrating to the U.S., they felt totally exploited.”
These working women felt ‘totally exploited’, so you might assume they would prefer staying at home with their children. Yet the Western Feminist movement claimed the home kitchen was ‘oppression’ and women should be ‘given the choice’ of work. I sometimes joke: “Women were given four choices: Work, work, work or work.” Women gleefully left the home and joined the workforce by the millions. Women keep falling for this stuff. Even Germaine Greer wrote:
“... my fantasy is that it might be possible to leap the steps of revolution and arrive at liberty and communism without strategy or revolutionary discipline.”
Supposedly, she has a dream that she can arrive at communism without revolutionary discipline. Does she mean without killing sixty-six million Russian Christians? [as reported by Alexander Solzhenitsyn] You may be bright enough to notice the illogic of placing the words ‘liberty’ and ‘communism’ next to each other.
Germaine Greer would have to be living a fantasy to link liberty and communism. A fine example of illogic that you need to be able to detect and counter. Bolshevik totalitarianism was not liberty. Millions of Christians died under Bolshevik rule. Gulags were Bolshevik and an expression of Christian credentials was enough to get you annihilated in a Bolshevik work camp. Feminist icon, Betty Freidan (Jewish) extolled the opportunities for females in Communism. Gloria Steinem (Jewish) says that German Jewish women operating as Communists were the forerunners of modern feminists. In the words of James E Joyce:
“Had there been no Communist revolutionary threat in post World War One Germany, Adolph Hitler and the Nazi party would have never come to power!” [2]
James E Joyce also tells us that:
“In the early nineteen twenties, the Russian controlled Communist attempted revolution to overthrow the German Republic failed.” [2]
Even Ronald Regan commented about this type of scenario:
“A majority can be controlled by a well-organised minority.”
A small band of armed foreigners walked in and overthrew the Russian government in a coup d’état whilst covering their violence by calling it a revolution. Once in power via this devious coup, the Bolsheviks set about destroying their opponents, in particular, the anarchists and Christian hierarchy, whom they saw as a threat to their state tyranny. Their coup morphed into the predicted violence that killed millions by war, terror, hunger, and disease in just a few years and left the country devastated. The whole foreign takeover and its mass killing and terrible atrocities severely kneecapped Russia’s potential and left its economy in disarray. In late 1917, the Bolsheviks quickly set up their apparatus of state repression, the notorious Cheka, as a ‘security’ force supposedly to combating counter-revolution and sabotage but in reality, it was a dreaded apparatus of repression that used extreme terror as their means of control. As in the French Revolution, the Reds use the Cheka to create ‘The Red Terror’ and kill those opposed to their leadership.
‘The Red Terror’, implemented by Dzerzhinsky on September 5, 1918, was vividly described by the Red Army journal ‘Krasnaya Gazeta’: “Without mercy, without sparing, we will kill our enemies in scores of hundreds. Let them be thousands, let them drown themselves in their own blood. For the blood of Lenin and Uritsky ... let there be floods of blood of the bourgeoisie — more blood, as much as possible...” Whist their press represented it as this:
As is usual with these things, what they said and what they did, did not match. Desperate conditions of famine under the confusion of tyrannical control magnified the death toll to unimaginable levels. Terror was a deliberate Bolshevik policy against the civilians.
While the royal family was held captive by the Bolsheviks whilst, civil war took hold through Russia as the so called ‘White Army’ tried to prevent the Communism usurpation of power. As the White Army moved forward, the Bolsheviks decided to prevent the rescue of the Romanovs. Like their solution to any problem, they killed the family.
At 2am on 17 July 1918, Nicholas, his wife, and their five children were awakened and told to prepare for departure. The group was taken to a small room downstairs. Eleven men entered the room and began firing. Tsar Nicholas and Tsarina Alexandra, their daughters Olga (22) Tatiana (21), Maria (19), Anastasia (17) and Alexei (13) fell under a hail of bullets. In a ritual of evil, the family’s corpses were then stripped naked, mutilated, disfigured, burned with petrol and acid and secretly buried. So fell Christian Russia, which had for more than nine-hundred years resisted both the Mongol-Tartar hordes from the East and the Catholic-Protestant hordes from the West, keeping the balance in the world from these extremists. In King and Wilson’s ‘Fate of the Romanovs’, there is an account by Gibbes about the Grand Duchesses: “The abuse reached a crescendo as the night wore on. Gibbes, locked away in his cabin, listened helplessly, as he later told his son George, as the drunken guards harassed the Grand Duchesses. ‘It was dreadful, what they did,’ the former tutor recalled. The ‘terrified screams’ of the girls, Gibbes said, haunted him ‘to the end of his life.’ ” General opinion seems to be that the girls were not raped but merely harassed by drunken Bolshevik guards.
The Jerusalem Post records the Jewish nature of the Bolsheviks:
“Most proverbially, a Jew — Yakov Sverdlov — oversaw the night-time execution of Czar Nikolai, Empress Alexandra, and their five children.
Jewish revolutionaries were prominent beyond Russia as well.
In Germany, philosopher-economist Rosa Luxemburg led an abortive revolution in 1919 before being caught, clubbed, shot dead and dumped in a canal. In Hungary, Bela Kun — originally Kohn — led a short-lived communist coup several months after Luxemburg’s murder.
In Romania, Ana Pauker — originally Hebrew teacher Hannah Rabinsohn, and later the world’s first woman foreign minister — effectively ran the country for Stalin, before falling from grace and spending her last years under house arrest. In Czechoslovakia, Rudolf Slansky was the second-most powerful figure before his public trial and execution alongside eleven other senior Jewish communists. In Poland, two of the three Stalinists who led its transition to communism — Hilary Minc, who collectivized its economy, and Jakub Berman, who headed its secret police — were Jews.
The revolution, in short, was so crowded with Jews that one had to wonder whether “the Jews” were inherently revolutionary. ...
Jews are now overwhelmingly academics, bankers, businesspeople, lawyers, doctors, journalists, literati and politicians, who do not encourage their children to join the proletariat. Yes, many Jews give the poor much charity and also back assorted social-democratic political formations, but on the whole the Jews are now in the business of preserving the social-political order, rather than turning it on its head.” [Was The Bolshevik Revolution A Jewish Plot? by Amotz Asa-el] [3]
Gloria Steinem glorifies the role of the women who were involved in and initiated the Chinese Red Brigade Cultural Revolution that caused untold devastation in China.
It can be worded politely as:
“While the Communist revolution brought women more job opportunities, it also made their interests subordinate to collective goals.”
Which can be translated as “They lost their freedom and were herded into the workforce.” Women went from this:
To this:
The same quote continues:
“Mao’s words and policies did little to alleviate women’s domestic burdens like housework and child care. And by inundating society with rhetoric blithely celebrating its achievements, the revolution deprived women of the private language with which they might understand and articulate their personal experiences.”
I will translate that as “Women lost control.” Women previously wore colourful clothes and swanned around whilst sending their man-slaves out to work and run the ‘show’. They were brought down to the level of man-slaves, dressed in drab clothes and forced to do unpleasant work that had previously been done by their willing man-slaves. The state now used mass murder and forced abortion? Mao pronounced: “Women hold up half the sky.” In the words of Kent Warren McDonnald:
“Women didn’t hold up half the sky in Communist China. They died by the millions and lived under a slave regime if they didn’t.” [5]
He sarcastically comments about what these female revolutionaries achieved for women:
“Communism taught women to dream big. They could one day be commissioners of re-education, breeding machines, or victims of forcible abortion. They could also be slaughtered en masse — Chinese communism resulted in sixty-five million dead at minimum — and killed via abortion in utero (some reports suggest at least 191 million female babies have been killed, resulting in a shortfall of women by approximately 30-40 million).”
“Do as we say or die”. They could happily join the army and shoot their own countrymen. (Country-people — They previously avoided shooting women!)
If you think you are immune from propaganda, have a look at this meme:
This is propaganda:
This is reality.
During the Great Leap Forward of 1958 - 1959, millions more women were drawn out of the home and pushed into the labour force. Were they ‘liberated’ or pushed into work-slavery for the nation? They were given a choice - work, work or work. The people’s communes built nurseries and kindergartens so that the ‘liberated’ women could enjoy working up to their knees in cold mud in fields or breaking rocks on construction projects rather than the oppression of caring for their young ones. Yet time and again, women think that their part in aiding the illogic of the revolution was for their benefit. The false belief propagandized by the Chinese Communist Party was that the full participation of women in the labour force was essential for attaining equality between women and men. It was anything but. It brought women down to the level of men from their exalted position is society. Before Communism they were ‘oppressed’ as you can witness:
After Communism they were ‘liberated’ so they could bend over smelly metal objects and breath health damaging welding fumes in a non-vented helmet:
For some reason, women fall for this propaganda every time. Tell women that they can be freed and have things and they grab for it without any use of logic. Under Communist equality, women did a hard day’s work to prove equality, then went home to do the housework. Their revolutionary efforts got them a ‘double shift’ that included: cooking, sewing, child-rearing, shopping, and cleaning. Once girls were ‘freed’ from the ‘influence’ (guidance) of family, they were available to roam the country as ‘Red Guards’ causing the havoc of the Cultural Revolution. They were tricked into challenging (denouncing) their parents, teachers, and officials. You can see similar happening in the West. They do so with a heartless straight face. The West currently calls them ‘Social Justice Warriors’. One described:
“This cohort ... was free from social expectations of the roles of wife and mother...”
Propaganda had overridden their natural instincts and encouraged work rather than family as it is currently doing to girls in the West.
Female participation in the Chinese Communist Party’s Central Committee gradually rose from 4% to 10% to 13%. So women were pushed into the militia and workforce by a central committee composed of men. So we are not talking general equality, just a procedure that put women to work for the glory of Communism, and not for the benefit of women. I hear and read that previously, the man would go to work and was expected to bring the wage packet home and give it to his wife. Communism sent the women to work in the factories and fields as well as doing the house duties.
Gloria Steinem also extols the role of women in the overthrow of the Shah of Iran. The Iranians that I meet around the world that escaped the madness speak bad stories of life in Iran after the overthrow and refer to the time of the Shah as: “the good time”. During the time of the ‘Pahlavi’ shahs, women received universal education, an improved social standing, and the vote. The government had forbidden women from wearing the chador. Women held jobs as government ministers, scientists, and judges and obtained the right to divorce. Along came 1979 and women played a significant role in the Islamic Revolution. In significant numbers, they marched in the streets to drive Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi from power. When Ayatollah Khomeini took power, they lost a many of their so-called ‘rights’. The Ayatollah Khomeini government demanded that women wear a chador in public. Refusal to do so could lead to a public whipping. [7] Males could again declare “I divorce you” three times to end a marriage. Women could no longer demand divorce. In a court, the testimony of two women is considered equal the testimony of one man. Women accused of adultery need to prove innocence, and a verdict of guilty may lead to execution by stoning. This is approximately the opposite of the west where a man accused of rape has effectively to prove innocence. One might expect that the bias would heavily discourage both men and women from adultery in Iran. However, in the West, the possibility of false rape allegations is prone to discourage men from creating relationships. A law does not always do what it is expected to do. A law preventing women from initiating a divorce might encourage reticent males to marry and thus it may be an advantage to women wishing to marry. A court bias to women at divorce time may appear to favour women but it discouraged young males from getting married so it is against the interests of women. Under the Ayatollah Khomeini government, unmarried couples who hold hands, have sex or even date can be arrested, fined, and possibly flogged. In 2012, the Guardian reported that:
“This week, Iran’s parliament approved a new amendment to a controversial law in the civil code that allows men to have as many sexual partners as they want — all sanctioned by sharia law under the term ‘temporary marriage’. Sex outside marriage is a crime in Iran punishable by 100 lashes or, in the case of adultery, potentially a sentence of death by stoning. However, a man and a woman can marry for a fixed period of time after performing specific religious rituals, in a practice called sigheh. The marriage can last for a few minutes up to several years without need to be officially registered. The man can end the sigheh almost at any time, but there is no divorce right for women in temporary marriages.” [6]
Sometimes the temporary marriage can turn into a full marriage and registration is required in the event of a pregnancy.
The Iranian lady serving at the swimming pool café said the government was either “mad or bad”. She said people put money in overseas accounts in case they needed to escape. She called the time of the shah as the “good times”. I’ve heard this a few times. So Gloria Steinem is glorifying something that put women in a worse state. She also claims gains for women when a Christian approach is to obtain gains for all persons, but then again, she is not Christian — she is Jewish.
Sunni and Shiite Muslims differ on their acceptance of temporary marriage. The Shiite Muslims claim that temporary marriage was practiced before the advent of Islam and was an acceptable procedure to the Prophet Muhammad. The Sunni Muslims, quickly rejected temporary marriage, believing that it was prostitution by another name. These days it is only the Shiite communities that allow temporary marriage and it occurs mainly in Iran and sometimes in Iraq.
The usurers played a significant role in the creation of communism in Russia. It was not just a trainload of Bolsheviks running in with guns to take over by force a government weakened by orchestrated upheaval. Rep. Louis T. McFadden, chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee during the 1920-30s explained it this way:
“The course of Russian history has, indeed, been greatly affected by the operations of international bankers... The Soviet Government has been given United States Treasury funds by the Federal Reserve Board... acting through the Chase Bank. ... England has drawn money from us through the Federal Reserve Banks and has re-lent it at high rates of interest to the Soviet Government... The Dnieperstory Dam was built with funds unlawfully taken from the United States Treasury by the corrupt and dishonest Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks.” [8]
With monarchs removed, empires collapsed, and with Russia taken down by communism, the usurers had control of all major national economies. Today the bankers reign supreme.
Whilst Russia was being taken down by Communism, a clever man by the name of Gottfried Feder stated:
“Through intensive enlightenment of the people, it is to be made clear to the people that money is and should be nothing other than a voucher for completed labor; that while every highly developed economy, of course, has need of money as a medium of exchange, the function of money also ends with that, and in no case should money be lent a supra-mundane power to grow of itself by means of interest, at the expense of productive labor.”
Feder said about money:
We now suffer under immense interest burdens as this was ignored. Feder recognised that interest created a spiral of debt and financial domination.
Rudolf Jung of the Austro-Hungarian empire had written on the subject of the problems caused by interest. Rudolf Jung stressed that there was a difference between income derived from real work and that arising from interest.
Gottfried Feder’s treatise on national economy, like Rudolf Jung’s, is remarkable for its strong moral basis and its requirement for social justice and nation building. Capitalism tends to have a soul-destroying materialistic spirit of self-interest with a corrupting effect in all fields of our public, economic and cultural life. Marxism, on the other hand, demands that everything belong to the state. Communism suffered from an inability to motivate its workers. National Socialism was intended to go back to the medieval and concept of ‘to each his own’. Each person will earn as much as he deserves according to his work performance, whilst requiring responsibility and duty. This National Socialism doctrine requires the serving ‘the public interest’ before self-interest. It does not demand profitability but a requirement to fill demand as the basis of the economy. National Socialism does not prohibit private property, but respects it as a privilege for the productive person.
The Jewish approach is to use land to exploit the labours and property of the inhabitants financially through a variety of legal methods including bonds and mortgages. By this means, ‘property’ is turned into a profitable ‘possession’. The National Socialist state puts limitations on the right to the use of property so that the welfare of the people and the nation is served rather than profiting of individuals.
Feder also advocated a move back to treating money as a token of ‘performed work’ or of a product to prevent money being hoarded so that it could be lent back at interest. This removes the profit making from lending at interest and the earning of unearned income. It had already become a problem that nations had become indebted to international high finance which had forced them to become interest-collectors these international banks causing nations to tax their working people. Feder called this economic process an: “international fraud”. Feder was effectively suggesting that the solution of the interest problem is also the breaking of the Jewish world-rule, because it smashes the power of world Jewry — its financial power. Feder advocated that the issue of money and credit should be the control of the state through a nationalised state bank. By this means, the state is freed from the interest burden to banks and private lenders. The government creates the money it needs rather than borrowing the money it needs to operate a nation. I often ask: “Who has the authority to create the money of the nation?” The answer is, of course, the government. I then ask: “Why then would the government be in debt?”
We are very lucky that the National Socialists of Germany halted the expansion of communism into the rest of Europe. James E Joyce gets particularly hot on the topic of communism verses German Socialism:
“Hitler’s followers were engaged in total street war with the German Communists. The German people were literally starving to death. The Communists in Germany were on the verge of success. Unlike Russia however, it was the strong middle class, unbelievably well disciplined, while starving to death, who sided with Hitler in his civil war against the German Communists.
The German middle class knew that if the German Communists won, then they themselves would very likely be annihilated.
The most prominent, outspoken leaders of the German and Russian Communist revolutionary efforts were radical Jewish intellectuals.”
The Germans already had documentary evidence of the mass deaths in Russia and elsewhere under Jewish Communism and thus reasonably believed that many millions of German Christians might die if the Communists gained power in Germany. It came to pass that many millions of German Christians died as the Capitalist controlled countries united with the Communist controlled countries to crush the country that followed Feder’s documentation. It was in 1927, that Feder published a comprehensive version of the programme entitled ‘Das Programm der NSDAP und seine weltanschaulichen Grundgedanken’. (The Manifesto for the Abolition of Enslavement to Interest on Money).
The communist propaganda always promised that their method of government would be superior, and the populous would have better lives with plenty of food, necessities and quality living. What it says and what it does never match. Slavenka Drakulic reports that:
“Each and every woman I spoke to, whether in Bulgaria or Poland, in Czechoslovakia or Hungary, could point out where communism had failed them: from shortages of food and disposable diapers to a scarcity of apartments and toilet paper. It was these banal, everyday things that defeated communism, long before 1989, and not, I am sorry to say, people’s desire for freedom, human rights and democracy.” [9]
Ulf Brunnbauer writes in 2000:
“Patriarchal values and structures were not eradicated, but the ‘family patriarch’ was replaced by the authoritarian state.”
Larrey Anderson, philosopher, writer and submissions editor for American Thinker, links feminism to Marxism, and concludes: “Feminism by grounding itself in the philosophy of Hegel and Marx, is condemning women to a new servitude: slavery to the State.”
We are beginning to see ritual denunciation as occurred in Stalinist Russia and Maoist China. People were targeted for ‘re-education’. Anybody doubting feminist issues is to be given ‘sensitivity training’. Be very careful not to say that “women are different to men”.
Some strains of feminism claim that differences between men and women are entirely due to upbringing. Thus, anyone claiming that females and males are different can be hounded out of a job. They only need to hound a few and the remainder become self-censoring. Mao implored the nation’s youth to purge any ‘impure’ elements in Chinese society in 1966. In a short time, his movement escalated as students formed paramilitary groups called Red Guards which attacked and harassed elderly persons and intellectual persons. Revolutions need a supply of victims or the minions end up turning against their masters as French Revolution leaders Maximilien de Robespierre and George Danton discovered during the French Revolution as they faced the guillotine. Do not think that it is natural for Western governments to be ‘tolerant’ by allowing Muslim gangs to rape European girls or black mobs to desecrate American towns.
Illogic can take hold as doctors in Chinese hospitals were ‘demoted’ to toilet cleaning operations, in violent upheavals carried out by the ignorant. In Mao’s ‘Cultural Revolution’, landlords, counter-revolutionaries, rich peasants, and ‘bad elements’ were singled out for humiliation. In the west, you might try using logic against a ‘Social Justice Warrior’ from the SJW movement.
Daphne Patai and Noretta Koertge in their book: ‘Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from the Strange World of Women’s Studies’ write something that would fit the Communist purges of the past:
“Our culture, including all that we are taught in schools and universities, is so infused with patriarchal thinking that it must be torn up root and branch if genuine change is to occur. Everything must go — even the allegedly universal disciplines of logic, mathematics and science, and the intellectual values of objectivity, clarity and precision on which the former depend.” [4]
A Social Justice Warrior is difficult to define as it has some fluidity.
The Urban Dictionary uses these descriptors. Note that ‘cis’ means normal. ‘Cis gendered’ means male or female as in normal gender. Thus normal people are labelled to suggest a problem or inferiority:
Cisgender is someone whose gender corresponds to their biological gender. In other words: totally normal. So normal becomes denounced. Someone who has worked hard for what they have gained, is ‘privileged’.
One commenter says that: “They will be the cause of the Downfall of Western Culture and Society as we know it!” One contributor gives this conversational example:
White straight male: “Hi”
SJW: “OMG! How dare you oppress me with your white male gaze. Get away from me you pig! Check your privilege!”
White straight male: “All I said was —”
SJW: “Stop hitting on me! Street harassment! Rape culture! Stop raping me!”
White straight male: “What are you talking about?”
SJW: “White devil stop raping me you ableist pig!”
Another person: “No use in trying to reason with her, she’s an SJW”
As you can see, SJWs have some similarity to the denunciation process in China, where logic got thrown out of the window.
The logic of being a useful member of society did not apply. Most rational people have great difficulty discussing things with irrational people. The result is that irrational ideas gain ascendency. You need to start preparing yourself to protect yourself against illogic. Dealing with illogic requires new thought processes for which you are unprepared. Type “sjw” into the internet to see videos of SJWs indulging in vocal gore to which you would have no defence. The Cultural Revolution generated slogans and derogatory words that appear ridiculous to a logical person. Illogic was used to effectively befuddle logical hard-working persons. Selfish rebels and Red Guards then take advantage. The dogmas and supposed sins which are the subject of SJW’s attacks will be compared to the illogic of the Cultural Revolution. New terms have been invented such as ‘intersectionality’ and ‘microaggressions’. One cannot deconstruct their dogma nor logically dispose of any of their dreaded sins. One now has to be wary of saying “Hello” to a SJW or a feminist. Just have a look at a popular internet video site. James Lawrence writes:
“The end for the Western Cultural Revolution will be nigh, not when the state legitimises human-animal marriage and the people (at last!) rise up in righteous fury, but when the people start to shrug their shoulders at the latest state edict on marriage and get on with contracting traditional marriages illicitly.”
Here are the words from a common meme that takes the piss out of SJWs:
Step One: We demand you include us in your space.
Step Two: We demand you change your space to accommodate us.
Step Three: We demand you stop harassing us because you don’t like our demands!
Step Four: We demand new laws or rules be enacted to remove ‘you’ from the space ‘we’ve’ created as you don’t fall in line with our vision of what the space should be!
Step Five: Why don’t you go off and create your own space if you don’t like it?
Step Six: We demand you not create your own space after we have kicked you out of ‘our’ space, as you having your own space is inherently racist, sexist, misogynistic, homophobic, and transphobic.
Rinse and Repeat.
My experiences of China, Ukraine, and the other ex Communist countries is that they have not recovered from the upheaval caused by communism. Russia has not recovered from the Bolshevik Coup, one-hundred years ago. The West will not recover from feminism for over one-hundred years. One person asked the question: “How can I be proud of my China if we are a nation of 1.4 billion cold hearts?”
Unfortunately, the Communist agenda is active in Western nations whilst operating under an alias name: Feminism. We also are becoming nations of ‘cold hearts’ where persons fail to smile.
In an interview, Simone de Beauvoir said:
“No woman should be authorized to stay at home and raise her children. Society should be totally different. Women should not have that choice, precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one.” [10]
An American Communist Party pamphlet from 1948 called ‘Woman Against Myth’ by Mary Inman contains:
“Rape is an expression of ... male supremacy ... the age-old economic, political and cultural exploitation of women by men.”
Relampago Furioso words the dilemma in this way:
“Under the old arrangement, for the ten best, most fertile years of a woman’s life, a man offered his entire life as he was loyal to her even after her fall from grace. Feminism puts an end to all that. It expects men to accept all of the baggage with none of the reward. Sorry, it doesn’t work that way.”
In 1984, Edward Griffin interviewed Yuri Alexandrovic Bezmenov. Yuri was born in 1939 in suburban Moscow, the son of a high ranking Soviet Army officer. Yuri became a ‘journalist’ for Novosti, the press agency of Russia which doubles as a front for the KGB. He became disgusted with the Soviet system and defected to the West in 1970. He was Pro-American and wrote and lectured on the methods of propaganda, disinformation, and subversion.
Bezmenov explained that psychological warfare has little to do with James Bond style spies. He explained that: “the main emphasis of the KGB is not in the area of intelligence at all.” He estimated fifteen percent of effort is spent on James Bond style espionage whilst the other eighty-five percent was devoted to the much slower process of ideological subversion and psychological warfare. The aim is to alter the citizen’s the perception of reality so that “despite the abundance of information no one is able to come to sensible conclusion in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country.” The brainwashing goes very slowly and consists of four stages.
It takes up to twenty years to demoralize a nation in the First Stage. One might describe this as ‘moral corruption’. He suggests that this is three generations of moral corruption. The KGB obtained compiling significant information on persons in positions to mould public opinion. This included journalists, editors, educators, actors, publishers, politicians, and business leaders. Those that two the line are promoted and those that don’t are hounded out of their jobs by any means necessary. Cynical, ego-centric people, with flexible morals, are suitable recruits. Some would call them sociopaths. Yuri Alexandrovic Bezmenov explains:
“The demoralization process in the United States is basically completed already for the last 25 years [50 years]. Actually, it’s over fulfilled because demoralization now reaches such areas where not even Comrade Andropov and all his experts would even dream of such tremendous success. Most of it is done by Americans to Americans thanks to lack of moral standards. As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who was demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. Even if I take him by force to the Soviet Union and show him the concentration camps...he will refuse to believe it.... until he is going to receive a kick in his fat bottom. When the military boot crashes - then he will understand, but not before that. That’s the tragedy of the situation of demoralization.”
Stage Two involves destabilization. The subverter does not care about your ideas and the patterns of your consumption, whether you eat junk food and get fat and flabby no longer matters. It takes two to five years to destabilize a nation. Only the essentials matter and this includes the economy, foreign relations, [and] defence systems. Yuri says:
“And you can see it quite clearly that in some... sensitive areas such as defense and [the] economy, the influence of Marxist-Leninist ideas in the United States is absolutely fantastic. I could never believe it fourteen years ago when I landed in this part of the world that the process will go that fast.”
Stage Three involves a ‘Crisis’. The west has arrived at this stage. Talking about 1984, the year that this was written he tells us:
“It takes only up to 6 weeks to bring a country to the verge of crisis. You can see it in Central America now [1984]; and after crisis, with the violent change of power structure and economy.”
Yuri then tells us about Stage Four — ‘Normalization’. The term ‘Normalization’ is used in a cynical manner and is taken from Soviet propaganda. This ‘Normalization’ promises of
“all kinds of goodies, and paradise on Earth. To destabilize your economy, to eliminate the principle of free market competition; and to put a big brother government in Washington D.C.; with benevolent dictators ... who will promise lots of things. Never mind whether the promises are fulfilled or not. He will go to Moscow to kiss the bottoms of a new generation of Soviet Assassins. He will create false illusions that the situation is under control. Situation is NOT under control. Situation is disgustingly out of control. Most of the American politicians, media, and educational system train another generation of people who think they are living at the peacetime. False. United States is in a state of war; undeclared, total war against the basic principles and foundations of this system. And the initiator of this war is not Comrade Andropov of course — it’s the system. However, ridiculous it may sound, [it is] the world Communist system, or the world Communist conspiracy. ... This is it; this is the last country with freedom and possibility.”
In 1984, Yuri Bezmenov believed America needed a national effort to educate people in the patriotic sense of values with an explanation of the real danger of a socialist, communist, Big Brother state welfare system. We can now only watch as his prophesy becomes reality. Feminism was a big part of the procedure.
“If people fail to grasp the imminence of this danger and this development, nothing will help the United States. You can say goodbye to your freedoms. All your freedoms disappear...”
In the 1984 interview, the former KGB agent and Soviet diplomat, Yuri Bezmenov said:
“Feminists and other leftists are useful idiots who serve only to destabilize the society. When the goal is reached, they will be ‘lined up against the wall’.”
Kaylyn Atchison: “Feminism means the advocacy of woman’s rights on the basis of equality of the sexes. Being a feminist isn’t going to stop or help sexual assault, arranged marriages, stay at home dads, violence, the victims in Nepal, single mothers, and young woman trying to find a good husband.” [Kaylyn Atchison]
Josefin Helmarsson: “We need to fight this, girls. It is an evil that must be suppressed by ALL means necessary.”
Josefin preceded this with an inciteful blast that she titled ‘Feminism = Fascism’:
“The Feminists don’t take into account how men all through history, starting with the stone age, have given their very lives for us women. They fought for their survival. They’ve always let women and children go first into safety before themselves, into the lifeboat, transports etc etc. How is it going to be when the men are gone? Who will sacrifice their seat on that lifeboat for us women? ...
The hardline feminists who are at the top of this ‘food-chain’ will only end up controlling the women themselves... They will be the women’s masters. Women will eventually fight among themselves. They will fight for money, power, fame, fortune, career opportunities. We girls know that when women do this, it can get pretty nasty in our own way.
The feminist party FISIS in Sweden naturally want more women in the military. That’s fine, but how about the feminists go first... Hmmm? They should show a good example. Send them to the front of battle to get blown up to pieces, maimed, and injured. The hardline feminists act like men because they want to be men. Ok. Go and pick a fight with a man and see what it’s like in the men’s world. It isn’t pretty once the fists fly and bullets whizz by. There is no mercy. They will die like a dog for no good reason. In fact, the military in Sweden should be only women. Send them to foreign battlefields. They will be fighting and dying for the men and children at home. Switching places. Go right ahead.
Would a Feminist world-domination end all wars — in your dreams! ... we sure can crush Feminism for their hidden ideology and program...
We need to fight this, girls. It is an evil that must be suppressed by ALL means necessary.
There are laws of nature that cannot be shaken because of the future consequences of sustaining life. Feminists obviously haven’t put that into an equation. It’s called consequences.
I think a swell idea is (when things get really out of hand) to allocate a land mass for the feminists to relocate to and live in where they can do as they please with themselves. All feminists can immigrate there.” [11]