“What’s the fastest way to a man’s heart?

Through his chest with a sharp knife.”

Take a lead from Poland. Polish women fed up with force fed feminism:

The Polish women continue with:

“Being a feminist is a severe colostrum! Whenever I listen to the feminists’ emergence in the media, I am convinced that they want to turn their unpleasant experiences into the ideology of mass retaliation of women on men. Stop complaining and feeling sorry for yourself.”

and something that didn’t translate well:

“Today, pseudo-liberated women have gone out into the streets under ‘CzarnyPiątek’ and are demanding the right to kill their children.”

General McArthur was a great patriot, but with all his efforts, he did not manage to kerb the ‘insidious forces’ at work within the nation.

Our threat is from the insidious forces working from within which have already so drastically altered the character of our free institutions — those institutions we proudly called the American way of life.

Not only did this great American patriot warn us of the impending problem, our then Russian enemy did as well. Nikita Khrushchev, Russian, told us in 1959:

“Your children’s children will live under Communism. You Americans are so gullible. No, you won’t accept Communism outright, but we’ll keep feeding you small doses of Socialism until you will finally wake up and find that you already have Communism. We won’t ever have to fight you; we’ll weaken your economy until you fall like overripe fruit into our hands.”

Western bloc communism eventually crumbled, but my visits to Ukraine, Poland, Czech Republic and elsewhere tell me that their communism is being replaced by communism — reborn as feminism. As soon as the English language arrives in a nation, so does the degeneracy. Hopefully they are less gullible than us and block it and with luck they may help us to block it.

What women gained from feminism.

I often say: “It’s not wise to make enemies!” Enemies are people that are against you. It is much better to have people looking after your interests. Feminism has alienated the male population and males have become distrustful of women. This needs to be rectified. This lady sums it up:

“I guess I’m just left feeling really sad that no man can ever fully trust me. The problem isn’t just that it’s a bad situation for men. When someone has no power in a situation they cannot get out of, they tend to spread their unhappiness around with a big shovel.

Women get a lot of passive aggression, avoidance, and deceit directed at them due to their total power over relationships and sexuality. But they seem to think it’s a problem with the way men are, not a problem with how men are treated and how we feel about that.”

Don’t ever doubt the hidden aims of Feminism. Here is a classic. Mary Daly is all for male genocide when she writes:

“If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of males.”

Is Catherine Comins espousing women’s logic when she wrote?:

“Men who are unjustly accused of rape can sometimes gain from the experience.”

She makes me feel embarrassed to belong to the human race. The Feminist Icon Caitlin Moran says that girls “shouldn’t read any books written by men.” Perhaps they shouldn’t eat food made by men and should not use vibrators made by men. Here is some more feminist illogic from Catherine MacKinnon:

“In a patriarchal society, all heterosexual intercourse is rape because women, as a group, are not strong enough to give meaningful consent.”

Marilyn French got away with this remark:

“All men are rapists and that’s all they are.”

I showed one girl one of these comments and she said: “That is not feminism.” I did not bother with an argument. But when I search high and low, I do not find rebuttals to these quotes, I find support. If there are no rebuttals then it is difficult to argue that feminism is not a man-hate organization. Let us look at some feminist graffiti:

Men have been the butt of jokes made by women, but any man who answers back gets verbally attacked.

Bagging men is a popular activity amongst females. Even today, two girls started accusing males of being immature. I had already explained that the situation turns around at twenty-eight.

Sexual Market Value.

Here is a supposed joke on a page entitled: “Hilarious Jokes For Feminists Because Women Are Awesome”. This one is by Katy Brand:

“The best way to a man’s heart is through his hanky pocket with a bread knife”

I won’t indulge you with writing the joke with man replaced with woman. Here is another joke that claims to be funny. Killing people is not a laughing matter:

“What does it mean when a man is in your bed gasping for breath and calling your name?

You didn’t hold the pillow down long enough.”

Could I change the word man to: Woman, Kurd, Muslim, Jew, Christian, Child, Asian, Indian, cat, or dog without offense. Could I say: What’s the fastest way to a dog’s heart? Through its chest with a sharp knife. It might appear that the man is of lower status than a dog in the eyes of a feminist. Perhaps they might appreciate the Muslim killing of a woman who had married a non-Muslim:

Muslim killing of a woman who had married a non-Muslim.

Feminists should not be given the time of day because their rants are not good for women and children. And so I have created the:

The current argument for blaming men for being oppressive under patriarchy requires that a male be present. Yet around third of homes are fatherless. The children in these homes are suffering though fatherlessness. If there is no man present, it cannot be male oppression that is creating the current problems. Women’s liberation movement deemed to free women from the male oppression of patriarchy, yet women are being used by men in an increasing manner. With no sense of commitment, any enterprising man gets the immediate prize of the sexual act while the gullible girls, swimming in illogic, claim ‘freedom’ whilst being treated as cattle. The clamour for individual rights and self interest has created a generation of males who are clueless on how to lead a family. One article that I wrote for boys was on the importance of developing ‘principles’ and sticking to them. This included times when a girl might try to lead him astray through illogic. Christian patriarchy needs to be reinstated. In times gone by, if a threat to tribe or nation was detected, the men gathered to discuss how to deal with the threat and protect the important members who were primarily the women and children. Action is now required of men, and men will do what women collectively want. Men of old were expected to offer their lives in defence of the women and children. Women were the most respected and protected within the tribe because their survival ensured the survival of offspring. This was the core of patriarchy. Women were the respected, revered, and worshiped component of society and no male dare damage, speak ill, or compromise a woman’s privileged position in society. To do so brought great derision from all other males.

St. Paul talked about patriarchy as in these words: “For the husband is head of his wife just as Christ is head of the church”. [Ephesians 5] Paul’s patriarchy demands the male act just in the manner of the Crucified Christ — a leader prepared to offer himself as a benevolent sacrifice. The man worked for the family as a form of charity. He required men to be the head of the household, not through force but through charity. To lead is not to oppress. The good leader operates for the benefit and betterment of those he leads. Jesus was a troublesome rebel. When the Pharisees question his stand on divorce, a can of worms is opened. There is thought that Moses allowed divorce to prevent men from killing their wives when they got disenchanted with them. Jesus says: “It was because of your hardness of heart that Moses permitted you to divorce your wives; but it was not this way from the beginning.”. There is a suggestion that it was because of mistreatment of women (hardness of heart) that divorce was allowed. Jesus then refers back to the beginning of man by saying that “it was not always like this”. He refers back to Adam and Eve. Adam had to get on with Eve. Adam had to be decent to Eve. Cooperation was required. So we have lived for two thousand years under a ‘Christian Patriarchy’, as in ‘of Christ’, introduced by Jesus. This version of patriarchy required sacrifice by the male towards the female. It was a benevolent patriarchy. This placed women in the best situation in history. The male retained dignity and the male serviced and sacrificed for his wife. Under feminism, divorce rates have shot up, but the woman, may be worse off than her married peers, but generally, she lives off the alimony and the joint assets transferred to the female by so-called family courts or she lives off the state that harvests tax on the predominantly male income. Thus the current divorce rate is influenced by the availability of money without work. Feminist equality is selectively applied.

Democracy was a fascinating invention. However, it can be subverted. Parties were invented that had policies set by elites. There are invariably two parties both of which support the debt banking system and both support the the ideology of feminism. It is a rich man’s trick. They will be laughing all the way to your grave. Jon Drucks puts it this way: “Our choice in the Election after 9/11, 2004, was Skull and Bones Secret Society Member Royal George W Bush vs Skull and Bones Secret Society Member Royal John Kerry. We got Skull and Bones Royalty either way.” The Truth becomes a Conspiracy Theory and religion becomes the next enemy. Jon Drucks gets carried away when he shouts: “We are under the ‘Rule’ of the Evil Royal Elite Money Changers who nailed Jesus to the Cross, burned Joan of Arc at the Stake, put a Bullet In The Head of JFK, ‘Pulled’ off 9/11, and created the Oil Wars in the Name of God based on 9/11.”

Usury is a clever system where the moneymen manipulate house purchase so that they lend fictitious money for land purchase. My calculations and other’s calculations are that nearly one third of all we spend goes as interest to these money lenders as interest. Where one lobbyist exists in a nation, corruption exists. One lobbyist with a corporate expense account has more power than all the voters combined.

Bankrupting America is a planned strategy.

Any politician or party not approved by the lobbyists and their corporate backers gets no support and is demonised in the corporate press. We have a form of communism controlled by corporations. Britannica describes Corporatism as the representation of well-organized interest groups in the state apparatus, a phenomenon that may be seen as a way of the state giving in to specific interests. It is thus a political structure where Corporations impose policy onto Government. [Urban Dictionary] Urban Dictionary’s best description is: Corporatism has divested Governments of the ability to control policy, economy, and ultimately the fate of the nation. In the words of Mark Webster:

“If you vote for left-wing parties, you are supporting high-taxing, high-spending organizations that want to replace the traditional family unit with Big Government and will repeatedly bend over for Feminism and ‘Political Correctness’. Things like quotas, victimhood, gay marriage, and man hate speech become part of the daily vernacular, and you will see insanity such as hundreds of millions of dollars being borrowed to pay for feminist ‘foreign aid’ programs. To keep the baying mobs of feminists happy, leftist politicians ... maintain ... the status quo on blatantly misandrist divorce, alimony, and child custody laws.”

George Nada sums democracy as:

“Forget the voting thing. Elections are rigged and candidates are selected by those above them, not elected by us. It’s all theatre.”

And a reworded rant from Jon Drucks

“And they just keep on begging/voting for evil people to rule and manage over all of us year after oppressing year and always thinking that something good is going to come from constantly voting for evil. They are voting for their favorite brand of evil year after year!”

Unfortunately, all major political parties support feminism. Thus we are voting for feminist parties that also support ‘Political Correctness’ and ‘Social Justice’, none of which are beneficial to us.

Unfortunately, the policies demanded by feminists are particularly bad for young women. Many of young women struggle with dreadful student loan debt and then struggle to find a job that will get them out of their parent’s basement. Around forty-two percent of women have more than $30,000 in student loan debt. The figure for males is twenty-seven percent.

It is not helpful that young women at college hear that the world is stacked against them. Wage data is misrepresented to support the lie. Young women become encouraged to view themselves as victims of a phantom enemy.

Pushing policies that force others to bear the consequences of one’s actions will not advance the position of women as everyone sees their taxes increase for no overall benefit. Taxes are taken from those that do and given to those that don’t.

Feminism was claiming to remove the barriers of opportunity for women. The opportunities were to join the highly competitive workforce where male was pitted against male where failure was failure. The whole concept was capable of damaging the efficient use of male manpower in unpleasant and stressful work situations to support women. The fruit-loop ideology took a sharp turn and became a powerful lobby group for policies that do little to assist women.

People on college campuses need to reconsider whether modern feminism is helping advance woman’s position or whether they should pursue their hopes and dreams on their own terms. But is poses the question: Are the dreams appropriate? Looking into people’s mouths for forty years is not my idea of a life. As a lawyer friend of mine said: “Andy. You would not like to put up with the type of people that I have to deal with.” The modern justice system is no longer about justice but is used for gain. You don’t sue a poor person. I would not wish to spend my life turning people’s lies into truth. This has become the task of lawyers. Here is a despicable Hillary Clinton meme:

Hillary Clinton defended an accused child rapist, then laughed about his lenient sentence. She wrote in an affidavit that she had been informed “the complainant is emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and to engage in fantasizing.” However, this is all disputed. But it damages the trust in the judicial system. The picture is probably fake as well. But the concept of a degraded justice system stands.

Feminists on college campuses are encouraging girls to ignore the opinions of others and push for policies that disenfranchise conservative females and males. Thus, women meeting and discussing items to the exclusion of males. the following of feminism by mainstream parties then implements these ideas coming from isolated cliques of ideologically driven females that have a cult like nature. We all need to fight against the extreme biases that are being pushed onto us. We need to push the concept that true happiness and fulfilment comes from the happy union of man and woman, not the destructive illogic of feminism. The feminist viewpoint is contrary to loving relationships because of its extreme bias to consider only the female. But to consider the female is to create harmony with males in the fashion encouraged by Jesus. Feminism just demands selfish rights that satisfy their perceived needs, their perceived wants, and their perceived desires. Love, harmony, and children does not get included in this mix. As such, feminism can never serve women.

To unite women against men in what some might call ‘The bonds of sisterhood’ is to invite retaliation. Men will get their sex I told them, you are part of something far greater than yourselves and you must enter this sacred movement with and it won’t be by cooperation on women’s terms as under Christian Patriarchy. Christian males may have been subdued due to feminism infiltrating every strain of government but Muslim men do not accept this. Western women will be treated as ‘useful sex objects’ by Muslim males or converted to Islam and live under Sharia law. It is nonsensical to consider that women will be your friends, your support, your understanding, and love. you. Men, if not under the female guidance of patriarchy, will go back to the law of the jungle. They are already part way there.