by
Andy Chalkley
2018
I sometimes ask: “Did God make woman beautiful or did God make man’s mind believe that woman is beautiful.” Whatever the answer, men desire women. If this was not so — we would not be so. His desire for her beauty makes him weak at the knees. His heart flutters when she looks into his eyes. I say to the boys: “You think that strength is in the muscles, but strength is in the eyes. Try looking into a girl’s eyes and see who looks away first. Don’t look away. You need to learn how to speak with your eyes.” Strength is in the eyes — not in the muscles. The man uses muscle and logic — the woman uses eyes.
Woman’s secret lies in the ability of the woman to manipulate the emotions of a man to her advantage. She uses her position of physical weakness to take his power. She plays on his pride. She can strip his pride and rebuild his pride at will. She can augment his life or ruin his life. Although he is physically stronger, her manipulative skills utterly outclass his logical brain. He uses logic to communicate. A woman will stoop to logic when required but she will have a layer of thought that transcends the man’s logic as she comprehends the social dynamics in operation, an area almost invisible to the male. This human use of logic arrived with the logic of language. We have only had speech for one-hundred-thousand-years, so our primary communication was smiles. I say that it is still our primary communication. The smile is your primary means of communication. Speech is a secondary means of communication. Speech requires logic and males are good at logic, but he is weak at emotion and smiles. Males are good at logic but are notoriously weak with eye communication, which gives the female the advantage. You control your man with smiles and emotion including the emotions tied up in touch, hugs, and kisses. He often has the advantage when it comes to logic. You have the advantage elsewhere. The desired work-life balance for this woman is one that evades work and responsibility as in ‘Marry a Millionaire’.
A girl needs to know how to control her ‘environment’ through life. It is mostly part of biology. The girl needs to meet a male, ensure that he has what she wants in a male, be confident that he will be reliable enough to stay around for the children, whilst caring and providing for her during pregnancy, birth, and upbringing. She needs to know how to ‘influence’ the relationship so she can get what she biologically needs to create an appropriate surrounding commonly called a home. This is why she tests him out during the mating stage to check his resilience and his likely reliability during the birthing and upbringing of a child. She will test his resolve to weather the course though potential rocky patches in the relationship.
The control is initiated at the beginning of the relationship when the man is at his most vulnerable. When the woman realizes that the male likes her, she starts to use her special skills. She puts herself on a pedestal and make the male jump through hoops. She takes him on an emotional rollercoaster that jumbles his brain. He knows not whether she likes him or not. She tests him. Is he going to stay the course through thick and thin? Will he look after her needs in the long term? She ensures that there is no bigger thought in his mind than her. His day is consumed with thoughts for her. She makes him jump through hoops to test the endurance of his devotion — devotion to her needs. Once he has surrendered his power, for the most part, he is beyond the point of no return. He is putty in her hands. He may be a boxing champion or a chess master, but he is weak in her presence.
She didn’t do it on her own. His mother prepared him for subservience to a woman. This is why mothers train boys in duty, honour, resilience, and manliness whilst girls are given mild narcissistic guidance so that they think it is natural to use the assets of the male to get her through pregnancy, birth, and child-rearing. Boys were trained by mothers, to be emotionless which made them manipulable by skilful girls.
Now for a bit of trivia, the significance of which will occur later: There is an email in my inbox with the title “Women quit Labour over transgender row”. Three hundred women resign from the UK Labour party because a man who describes himself as female gets a position allocated for women. I shall come back to the significance of this in a while because it is the next stage as we move past Feminism into ‘Political Correctness’. Then, it will be possible for the propagandists to destroy the useful idiots who fell for their Feminism.
This book started after I had completed four books on economics. They were written after the questions the young asked me about the problems caused by the money system, particularly the inability to buy houses. Many girls, particularly the twenty-eight-year-olds ask me: “Andy. We can’t find males to marry us! What has gone wrong?” Or in broken English, they say: “Andy. Why not I find man to marry me?” In recent years, it has become: “Andy. We can’t even find boyfriends. The males have all gone cold. Why is this happening?” So, being a good little male, I am complying with their wishes. I started to write a book called: “I can’t find a boyfriend”, but what I discovered was way beyond my expectations. There are whole skill areas that women have to which males are blind and these were used by females of past generations to control the males of the world. This ‘Girl Power’ got thrown out of the window during the screeching propaganda and the upper hand was given to the males to run riot with female sexuality. “Drop your knickers — or you are sexually repressed.” It was a con job of magnificent proportions. And the women fell for it. Females major power structure was destroyed rendering the modern young girl almost powerless compared to her female ancestors. Unfortunately, it was the era of male funded and promoted seductive propaganda that utterly destroyed the woman’s cartel on matters sexual and destroyed the status of Western women. Years ago, Western women were regarded as the humans of the highest character in the world. Nothing was as puerile, honourable, and respectable as the ‘Western white woman’. It became a right. If you were born a woman, you were respected. If you were born a man, you had to work, produce, and provide. Worldwide, Western women are now known primarily for the way they obey male’s demands in porn films. Porn is almost entirely Western women on their knees with their mouths full of manliness with males looking down on them uttering commands. The situation has degraded so far that the Muslims, to keep their people’s dignity intact, teach their young males that European women ‘are as dirt’. The volume of porn secretly watched behind closed doors is humongous and it is almost entirely Western women subservient to demanding male actors. It portrays females seeking approval for having done a good job.
This is an immense reversal of ‘Girl Power’. Women controlled everything in society by proxy. It was remote control of males. ‘No money — No honey.’ was the formula and men lapped it up like little kittens. Men worked tirelessly doing all the nasty jobs in society for the benefit of women. Women called the shots — but alas no more.
To start the story, it must be remembered that Feminism was clever propaganda funded by males and promoted by males. It was designed to appeal to women. It was never designed to benefit females. What happened was the exact opposite of the words of the propaganda machine. Women were ‘oppressed’ in the kitchen so they were ‘freed’ for oppression in the corporate workforce. But that was ok, because there was an army of psycho psychiatrists to feed them antidepressants. Its effect was to destroy the female cartel on sex and destroy women’s main powerbase. The propaganda was spectacularly successful. In a blitz of illogic, Feminism broke the Woman’s Cartel. Women were to be ‘liberated’ from this situation and join the workforce and sex was no longer to be used to control males. Women were to be liberated and have sex with any male with society’s blessing. In the prevailing climate of illogic, a woman could not be considered as ‘liberated’ if she was not giving sex away for free. Girls purposely dropped their knickers to prove they were ‘liberated’. Girls have to prove they are not ‘frigid’ or ‘square’ of ‘hung-up’ by having sex with boys when they don’t wish to. Girls have to explain why they don’t wish to be screwed by a male. One girl’s comment follows:
“The Sexual Revolution tells me that I am abnormal if I don’t desire to make it with every Tom, Dick, of Jane that I see. I am only free to say ‘Yes’.” [10]
The power of ‘no’ is now in the hands of males as they are refusing to be subjugated by women in marriage. Here is another comment:
“Now you have to prove how liberated you are and men use that.” [10]
And another:
“All of them had come under intense pressure to have sex: the boys to show they were not ‘batty’, the girls to prove they were not ‘frigid’. Most had caved in — simply because... they could not think of a single reason to say no.” [11]
And one more:
“Most men didn’t give a damn about whether I wanted to have sex with them or not. If I didn’t want to screw them, they would make a moral thing out of it, and try to lecture me into being ‘free’.” [10]
Ten-thousand-years of the development of civilization destroyed in one bout of popularized illogic. ‘Sexual Liberation’ was no gain for women. Women now have a near impossible task finding a male to be subservient in marriage. Only the best-looking women have the ability to tie a man into male servitude. Sex had been the controlling method over males. In the past, if a man wanted sex with a girl, the girl made him grovel, made demands of him, tied him up with a strict set of rules, and tied his heart up in knots so to keep him in an emotional rollercoaster. Her demand was always: “If you want sex with me, you must marry me and when we get married, I decide when it shall happen, and what is more, you must give me your wage packet each week for the rest of your life.” Sex was incredibly ‘expensive’ for males. One single root required a lifetime of commitment. This was the ‘Women’s Cartel on Sex’ where men were sex starved enough to comply with female wishes. Women never gave sex away for free and any girl that did were ostracised with name calling that included whore, slut, and prostitute. Women hated women that gave it away for free. That is why brothels were illegal — to prevent men getting sex at low cost. No freedom of choice existed for any girl that broke the cartel. Men loved easy sex, but they could never get it. Men were kept in a state of sexual starvation. Men were not promiscuous because no girl would give them sex under the unwritten code amongst women that we shall here call: “The Women’s Cartel on Sex” Men were designed as a fucking machine and the woman’s cartel on sex made them sex-starved to the point of submission to woman’s demands. He voluntarily entered servitude to female and family and was honoured by being called: “A good father.” and: “A good family man.” and similar.
Even the terms ‘manliness’ and ‘good man’ referred to items that were to the benefit of women. ‘Good man’ means ‘he looks after his woman’. ‘He is romantic’ means ‘he grovels to his woman’. Feminism changed this and ‘manliness’ now refers to the number of girls he has bedded — all for free of course with girls that invite his enthusiasm to treat them as free prostitutes. Any enterprising young male can bed an endless supply of females in a male utopia. Some bed hundreds or thousands and some bed numerous in a day. All he needs is the consent word: ‘Yes’ and he is ‘in’. And ‘yes’ is plentiful in the modern world but was close to impossible in times gone by. Women still have the power of ‘no’ but only use it in marriage and there they overuse it.
Through history, sex was cleverly ‘demonized’ to be treated as a ‘naughty’ taboo subject so that women could say to their man-slave: “All you think about is the ‘s’ word”. The clever female would never even use the word ‘sex’, nor ‘penis’ nor ‘vagina’ so that she could control the supply of sex and his ‘amorous advances’. His desire for sex was not because he was virile but was because he was ‘naughty’ and was incapable of controlling his lust. His enthusiasm was turned to guilt. Woman’s control over men was almost tyrannical.
The male was given the honour of being ‘head of the family’ where he would announce the family decisions which she had made for him. If he failed to provide all that the woman desired, he was declared to be a failure. It was a one sided arrangement where he was to provide copious money for her to spend and if volume did not match her expectations, he was declared to be a failure and was publicly shamed. It is well summed up in the statement: “Men rule the world. Women rule the men” Men consider this to be a stupid joke as they only operate in the land of logic. Women have thinking that transcends male logic. Patriarchy was a clever system invented by females or supported by females to persuade males to work down the coal mine to bring money home to the woman and to run society entirely for the benefit of women and offspring. The trick called patriarchy completely removed the burden and stress of provisioning from females and dumped it on males. Jesus stood against the males and gave the power back to the women by enforcing ‘Christian Patriarchy’ on the males. It was women that wanted ‘Christian Patriarchy’ because it gave them a method of controlling males.
We descend from a line of violent wild animals and the male was the more violent gender. To curb male violence, young males were trained in the ways of ‘Christian Patriarchy’. This procedure was the prime way of taming males and harnessing their sexual energy for the benefit of women. Male sexual energy has been released by feminism and the males are taking advantage female sexuality.
If women were oppressed by males, women would not be able to say: “No.” in the bedroom. If women were oppressed by males there would not be so many women in cafés. The cafés would be full of males whilst the women were at work in the factories. If males had set up patriarchy, they had done a poor job of it. Most men were dominated by other men. They had high work death rates. High suicide rates. They had to work at nasty jobs. They were subscripted into armies to be shot in deplorable conditions. In the house, the women had the power of ‘no’ — and if he decided that his ‘yes’ overrode the woman’s ‘no’, he was tied to the local whipping post for blood to flow at the hands of local males.
Under the current epidemic of women wanting to work, corporations are doing very well with their new cohorts of enthusiastic females, whilst plenty of psychiatrists have become available to keep them to the task whilst joy has been replaced with anti-depressants, and children replaced with cats, and happiness with misery.
I often say to girls: “If I offered you four days rather than five, would you take it?” to which they reply: “Of course.” I say: “If I offered you three days instead of four, would you take it?” One reply was: “Who wouldn’t?” To which I reply: “It wasn’t the work that you wanted then, was it?” Women have been told to work. I say: “You can have all of the jobs, if you want them. We didn’t want the jobs in the first place. Our mothers told us we had to work. We were told that the man had to work to support a woman.”
This situation is summed up in the Beatles song. The lyrics explain what was happening:
“It’s been a hard day’s night, and I been working like a dog.”
“It’s been a hard day’s night, I should be sleeping like a log.”
He got up before sunrise. He walked to work in the dark. His face was black with coal dust with sweat lines as the drips fell from his brow. He had soot in his sandwiches. He walked home in the rain after dark. The next line gives the reason.
“But when I get home to you I’ll find the things that you do”
“Will make me feel alright.”
She smiled. She smiled and he felt good again. All she did was smile at him and he was happy again. He worked all day down a coal mine with black dust up his nose and in his ears. Sweat poured down his face making lines in the black coal dust. There was coal dust in his sandwich.
It was dark when he went to work in the frosty morning and it was dark as he walked home in the rain. When he entered the door, she gave him the ‘big smile’ that only a happy wife can give and he felt good instantaneously. He worked all day and the reward was the flash of a smile from his beloved wife.
The power is in the smile. She was using the primary communication of the smile and he was using the secondary communication of words and logic. It is the emotional power that women have over men. Men have logic and physical strength but women have emotion that is used to control men. The next line indicates that he was working for her benefit:
“You know I work all day to get you money to buy you things”
Men earned the money and women spent the money. He walks to work before the sun rises, does a soul-destroying work-shift, walks home in the rain, but he is happy because he gets a smile. The purpose of the work is to supply her with money. The trade is a smile for a day’s work. This is ‘The Secret’ — known only to women. (and a sneaky few wise old men — and these old men are on the young women’s side anyway! That’s me.) Women used men’s insatiable desire for women to control men. They controlled from a position of physical inferiority. She used all her womanly tactics to control the big strong man. The control is also affected by the control of access to sex. Women, as a group, maneuvered themselves into a position to control men. They gave themselves the power of ‘No’ and they trained the little tiny males to defer to women. You can see it every day in shopping centres all over the world: little boy following his mother’s instructions.
Men were expected to bring home money by any means and to run society for the benefit of women. Patriarchy was a con. Patriarchy was matriarchy in disguise. Our female ancestors had learned that it was necessary to keep males occupied with ‘responsibilities’ so that they were ‘upright’ members of society. Man’s natural state is to be lazy and cause trouble. Better that, they are harnessed to labour for the benefit of women. It turns out that patriarchy was matriarchy in disguise. Women controlled men who thought they were controlling women. It was a perfect double-bluff. “You are in charge — just run it for my benefit!”
Patriarchy craftily told men that it was their duty in life to run society for the benefit of society which was a euphemism for females and offspring. Gender roles ensured that males were kept out doing all the unpleasant, dirty, and stressful components of civilisation for females. Females could go and lead the café lifestyle discussing what their man-slave had recently bought them. Gender roles enslaved males. Traditional gender roles dictated that the male should be strong, resilient and devoid of emotion. Men were responsible for taking care of the family financially. They took this role as sole provider very seriously — so seriously that failure to provide for a wife and children is a common cause of male suicide. Women were portrayed as delicate creatures which enabled them to defer manual labour to males.
This is all tied up in what past females called: “The Secret”. It is ‘The Secret’ by which women guided their men from cradle to grave to operate for the benefit of females. Male life was entirely linked to servicing the needs and desires of women. The women controlled the crèche to indoctrinate the males, the kitchen, to make the males dependent on women for food, and the bedroom, to keep the male sex starved. The indoctrination of males started at a very young age by their mothers.
Mother’s indoctrination of boys starts with: “You never hit a girl” and “You are not scared of the dark are you?” and “Boys don’t cry!”. A boy then becomes an emotionless pawn in the hands of a skilled woman. Male desire for females and procreation makes them easy targets in a woman controlled landscape.
Unfortunately, the illogicality of equality did not bring women up to the level of men, it brought women down from a revered and highly privileged status to the pathetic level of men.
If men were so awful, why would woman want to emulate men? Illogic won the day and women now use antidepressants to survive a dreary office life obsessed with a concept of success that involves a desk closer to a window and better parking spot in the company carpark.
These were the very same tricks that were used to make the gullible males competitive in the workplace. Women now reach sixty with a history of dead cats and the recognition that they failed to have a family. As one sixty-five-year-old said: “Why did this have to happen to me?”
Here is a picture taken at my grandmother’s 100th birthday with most of her direct descendants and a few beloved spouses. They have tricked you out of this.
This book is designed to re-teach ‘The Secret’ so lost in the clamour of “Equality”. Yes, equality was successful. It successfully brought women down to the level of males. It destroyed women’s status. It destroyed the Woman’s Cartel. It fed the women into the corporate workforce.
When I was born, Western women were the most respected being on the earth. One comment is: “Women of the Victorian era were treated with the utmost respect.” They were the most revered beings in the world. Around one hundred years ago, Nikola Tesla, the inventor, described women thus:
“I had always thought of woman as possessing those delicate qualities of mind and soul that made her in these respects far superior to man. I had put her on a lofty pedestal, figuratively speaking, and ranked her in certain important attributes considerably higher than man. I worshiped at the feet of the creature I had raised to this height, and, like every true worshiper, I felt myself unworthy of the object of my worship.”
Women went from the loftiest heights to being described in numerous degrading terms. Males, in their forums, write advice to each other such as:
“All girls are sluts and love meeting a strong, dominant man who is able to seduce them and teach them new things about their own bodies that they didn’t even know their bodies could do.”
And
“You succeed with women by treating them all like ‘sluts’ or whores and taking them to bed and pleasuring them extremely well and making them feel good about themselves afterwards.”
In a master-slave relationship, who does all the nasty work? — the slave! Who gives the orders? — the master. It is where the expression: ‘She who must be obeyed’ comes from. The man is allowed to talk freely until she says: “Tut tut!”, whence he goes entirely silent. Sit in a restaurant. If the male says a wrong word, she taps the table two times and he becomes silent like a well-trained dog. Three taps is a major offense and he will be in the dog-house for a week or two. This is code for ‘no sex for a fortnight’. She will control her urges to demonstrate that sex is a controlled availability dependent on his compliance with her wishes. This was stated by one of my ex-apprentices as: “Happy wife. Happy life.” His happiness depends on him keeping her happy.
The ‘Labour Women’ comment at the start was to illustrate that Feminism is morphing into ‘Political Correctness’ where women will further lose power and influence. The term ‘white privilege’ crops up in ‘Political Correctness’ as does ‘white feminism’. It relies on people’s fear of being denounced for an imagined prejudice. The normal is subjugated to a hypersensitive phantom enemy. The tyranny of western males will be replaced by the tyranny of the normal by those deemed ‘disadvantaged’ on behalf of those that dictate from their real positions of privilege. This is a kind of phantom enemy. Citizens self-censor to avoid giving needless offense to this invisible enemy. Religion, gender, race, sexual preference, class, can be very clever tools to use as propaganda or to silence dissent. The term ‘Political Correctness’ comes straight out of Communism where dissenters were silenced to follow strict party dogma. Ideologies, by their very nature, set one group against another and women will be further disadvantaged. Feminism did not increase male adoration of females, it decimated it. Respect for women plummeted. Feminism turned males into a despised group not worthy of support in the eyes of the legal system. ‘Political Correctness’ will next do the same to Western females. Women in strife in Europe receive little assistance from the males that were trodden on by feminism and now receive receive little assistance assistance from the state following ‘Political Correctness’. Witness the constant rape of European women by Middle Eastern gangs and the lack of assistance from downtrodden males nor justice from a Politically Correct government. We are entering dangerous times for Western women.
Next to fear is the apocalypse. Women always fare badly in a societal breakdown as occurs in war, civil war, invasion, or financial collapse. In the words of one meme with a speech bubble coming out of the mouth of an African lady:
“Too many of my sisters had sided against the black man for money. When you are in need of protection and support, expect that same lack of loyalty.” Witness the lack of male response to the rape epidemic in Europe. The increasing violence ranges from verbal abuse to gang rape. Western men are not going to defend these women as Western womankind have so degraded themselves and so demeaned males that Western males are not rushing to their defence. Men can ask: “Have Western females degraded themselves to morph into the persons they are said to oppose: uneducated objects of pleasure more interested in lust than with status?” Men are treating girls the way that women now treat men — no value beyond the sexual. When a man boasts of sleeping with five-hundred girls — that’s five-hundred girls that said: “Yes.”
As Germany was overrun at the end of World War Two, a Soviet war correspondent said: “The Russian soldiers were raping every German female from eight to eighty. It was an army of rapists.” Laws are not enough to tame the males. They must be conditioned at an early age if the world is to be a safe place for females and they must be gainfully employed so that they don’t become idle street louts not feared of anything including consequences of offences against women!
The men went down to their icy deaths on the Titanic. No more will men defend women against adversaries. Women have changed themselves into ‘Competition’ against men, as they changed themselves from the emotional controllers of love-struck men. Women no longer control men, they compete with them and lose more often than they win. Such are the words of so many songs: “I’m a fool for your love.” and fool he was. Britney Spears sings: “I played with your heart, got lost in the game... You think I’m in love. That I’m sent from above.” Then she adds the bit that men do not comprehend: “I’m not that innocent.” The main tool was the smile to which the man had no power. I tell young males: “You think strength is in the muscles — but you are wrong. Strength is in the eyes. When you look into the eyes of a girl, who looks away first — the male. She overpowers you with her eyes.” To a woman, strength is in the smile and the eyes. The smiling female can manipulate the man that thinks he is strong, for he has little strength in eye to eye combat with a woman. She wins every time. Well, she used to win. Now she does the work in the office, at home, and in the bedroom. Porn has taught men how to be superior in the bedroom and created a humiliation and degradation for women. This is what young males now watch in darkened rooms with a female singing in the background: “Until the last drop.”
It is, in effect, non-stop degradation of women and anti-biology propaganda. The penis is put every place except where it was designed. Compliant cash strapped female actors follow the stud’s every demeaning command whilst getting slapped around. Heterosexual porn may have a vulgar side but there is now a move toward degradation porn where male dominance and female subservience is emphasised. Sperm spatters demonstrate dominance. For all the screaming emulating mob-rule, women have not been empowered in the bedroom. In the words of an African: “sex went from normal to uncomfortably freaky. ... It is sad that my sisters have to be fc*ked in the ass just to have a man in their lives.” What we are witnessing cannot be described as “Sexual Liberation”. It is not appropriate to bring our young males up in a culture where porn and rap-music-inspired abuse of women becomes their major form of training in sexuality.
The task is to rectify this imbalance that has fallen in favour of males by reinstating the power of women lost during my lifetime to the idle illogicality of equality. There should never be equality. Women should be on a pedestal where they are worshiped by males. Equality is no way to run a civilisation. Your female ancestors cleverly disguised a matriarchy as patriarchy to fool men into doing all the nasty jobs and running society entirely for the benefit of women and children. It was a masterful double bluff by your female ancestors of a magnitude that the modern woman is incapable of comprehending or inventing. Women told men that men were in charge so that men ran society for them. It was sealed by an outstanding rebel two thousand years ago. It was called “Christian Patriarchy”, and when women realised what power patriarchy gave them, they took to it enthusiastically. That is why Christianity was so popular — it gave immense power to women. Women controlled the crèche, the stomach, the house, and the bedroom. They might also control his emotional and mental state, his employment, and his movement. “You’re late! Where have you been?” Men were the spiders that got eaten after the event, yet it was entirely hidden from men. Men were so dumb that they thought they were in charge. Girls in the know call it “The Secret” — known only to females. In a master-slave relationship, the slave does the work and if he keeps the master happy, he gets fed and given an occasional perk. The male was sent to slave in the mine whilst the woman enjoyed the freedom of home whilst cleverly complaining about her excessive workload. What we have now is a slave rebellion amongst the males where they refuse to be subjugated to women — they refuse to become subjugated in marriage.
This book gives you young women the ammunition to put your ‘yet to be known’ future in order.